Search Results for "bid validity"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "bid validity"

335 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 335 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Implead Third Party in Arbitration — Section 37(2)(a) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Does Not Encompass Orders on Impleadment. Denial of impleadment of a third party as a veritable party is not an appealable order under Section 37(2)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 May 2026

The petitioner, Deepak Shripat More, filed a petition under Section 37(2)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order dated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Demand on Development Agreement — Lease Deed Not a Conveyance Under Maharashtra Stamp Act. Agreement for lease with possession does not amount to conveyance under Article 25 of Schedule I of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958, and stamp duty is payable under Article 36.

18 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Deepak Fertilizers and Petrochemicals Corporation Limited, entered into a development agreement-cum-lease deed with respondent No. 3, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging SEBI's Ex-Parte Interim Order in Securities Market Manipulation Case. Court upholds SEBI's power to issue ex-parte interim directions under Section 11B of SEBI Act, 1992 to protect market integrity.

15 May 2025

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by Hemant Kulshrestha and Vinay Bansal challenging an ex-parte interim order passed by the Se...

High Court

High Court Appoints Arbitrator in Contract Dispute Between Power Solutions Company and Electricity Supply Company. Petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 allowed due to failure of respondent to appoint arbitrator as per clause 4.1 of contract agreement dated 28.03.2018.

21 Apr 2022

The petitioner, M/s Nsure Reliable Power Solutions Pvt Ltd, a private limited company engaged in infrastructure business, participated in a tender flo...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Against Bank Forfeiture — Directs Refund of Rs.24.10 Lakhs Deposit with Interest. Forfeiture of deposit without contractual authority in auction sale is arbitrary and unjust, warranting refund with interest at 6% per annum.

20 Apr 2022

The petitioner, P Balaji Babu, participated in an auction conducted by the State Bank of India (respondent No.1) for the sale of immovable property ow...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 9 Interim Relief in Arbitration Dispute Over Development Agreement Termination. Court Holds That Termination of Development Agreement by Cooperative Housing Society Was Valid and Appellant Failed to Make Out a Prima Facie Case for Interim Protection Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Aug 2016

The appellant, M/s. Amisha Buildcon Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the order d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Distributorship Dispute — Rejects Claim for Loss of Profits for Period Without Written Agreement. The court held that the arbitrator's finding that no implied contract existed for the period 14th June 2006 to 31st March 2007 was not perverse or against public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Jun 2015

The petitioner, Diversey India Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of LPG Distributorship Applications Due to Technical Lease Defect — Correction Deed Validates Compliance with Eligibility Criteria. The court held that a correction deed executed to rectify the lease commencement date should be considered and the rejection was arbitrary.

11 Dec 2014

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Vilas Rambhau Chaudhari and Ramakant Dattu Magar challenging the rejection of their applications for...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Railway Contract Dispute Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Failure of Respondent to Appoint Arbitrator Within 30 Days of Demand Triggers Court's Power to Appoint Arbitrator.

12 Nov 2014

The applicant, M/s. Railtech Infraventure Pvt. Ltd., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appoi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking to Restrain CIDCO from Enforcing Contractual Stipulation. Writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked to prevent a party to an agreement from insisting upon a contractual term.

25 Jun 2014

The petitioner, M/s G.D.C. Buildcon Pvt Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seekin...

31 32 33 34

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)