CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3931 OF 2016
14 Dec 2016The petitioner, a former PWD Minister of Maharashtra, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging his ar...
Search Results for "arbitrary exclusion"
793 result(s) found
Found 793 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Mandatory Video Recording of Court Proceedings; Court Finds No Fundamental Right to Such Recording and Leaves Policy Decision to High Court Administration.
7 Jan 2016The Bombay High Court heard two petitions together: a writ petition by Sunil Shantisarup Gupta and a criminal application by Indur Kartar Chhugani, bo...
- 35
High Court
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.66 OF 2003
21 Nov 2006The public interest litigation was filed by a journalist challenging the decision of the State of Maharashtra under Section 37 of the Maharashtra Regi...
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Law Graduate's Petition Challenging University's Exclusion of Grace and Revaluation Marks for Merit Ranking. Grace Marks Under Circular No. UG/155 of 1998 Are Unmerited Favour and Cannot Be Claimed as Right for Determining First Position in Examination; Petition Dismissed as No Interference Warranted.
30 Aug 2005The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by a law graduate who sought first rank in the Bachelor of Legal Sciences (BLS) examination conducted by ...
- 40
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Challenge by Parsi Zoroastrian Community Members Against Trustees' Resolution Banning Priests for Performing Allegedly Irreligious Ceremonies. The Core Issue is Whether the Deed of Trust of 1884 Empowers Trustees to Restrict Priests' Access to Religious Properties Based on Religious Orthodoxy.
11 Mar 2011The dispute arose from a resolution passed by the trustees of the Parsi Panchayat Funds and Properties on 9 June 2009, banning two Parsi Zoroastrian p...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit by Indian Agent Against Italian Principal for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction and Failure to Prove Defective Machinery Claim. Dispute Over Commission and Damages Dismissed as Contracts Contained Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Favor of Turin Courts and Plaintiff Failed to Prove Defect or Entitlement Under Novated Agreement.
20 Sep 2010The dispute arose from a commercial agency relationship between an Indian company and an Italian company for the sale and distribution of equipment in...
- 15
High Court
High Court Directs Coastal Zone Authority to Decide on Mangrove Cutting for High-Speed Rail Project. Court Holds That Expert Bodies Must First Determine Larger Public Interest Before Permitting Destruction of Mangroves Under Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 2011.
9 Dec 2022The writ petition arose from a decision of the Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority (MCZMA) deferring permission for the National High Speed ...
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Public Interest Litigation on Railway Double Tracking Permissions. The Petitioners Contended That Railway Authorities Must Obtain Prior Permissions Under Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, Town and Country Planning Act, 1974, Irrigation Act, 1973, Land Revenue Code, 1968 and CRZ Notification, 2011, and That Section 11 of Railways Act, 1989 Does Not Exempt Such Permissions.
3 Aug 2022By way of a public interest litigation, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, and three residents of Guirdolim, Chandor and...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Promoter's Appeal in IBC Withdrawal Case — Commercial Wisdom of Committee of Creditors Cannot Be Overridden by NCLT/NCLAT. Settlement Plan Approved by 94.23% Voting Share Under Section 12A of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Must Be Respected.
28 Jan 2022The case involves appeals by Vallal RCK, the promoter of M/s Siva Industries and Holdings Limited (Corporate Debtor), against the common judgment of t...
- 384
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds HPC Classification for Interim Bail During COVID-19 Pandemic — Reasonable Classification Permissible Under Article 14. The Court held that classification based on nature and severity of offence for interim bail during pandemic is valid and not discriminatory under Article 14 of the Constitution.
22 Sep 2020The petitioners, National Alliance for People’s Movements and others, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging th...
- 167
