Search Results for "Preventive Detention Act"

919 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 919 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish threat to public order.

The petitioner, Irfan @ Nadi S/O Ramzan Shaikh, through his mother Bilkisbanu Ramzan Shaikh, challenged the preventive detention order dated 31/12/202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention without evidence of impact on public order.

The petitioner, Arjun S/o Ganeshbhai Yadav, was preventively detained by the Commissioner of Police, Surat City, vide order dated 22.12.2025, under th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Sampantram s/o Rameshwarram Choudhary, through his father Rameshwar Ram s/o Pala Ram Choudhary, challenged the legality and validity o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish that the detenue's activities affected public order.

The petitioner, Nilesh @ Dodo Dineshbhai Patni, through his mother Sangitaben Dineshbhai Patni, challenged the legality and validity of a preventive d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Nirmalsing Rajendrasing Tank Chikhligar, through his father Rajendrasing Ratansing Chikhligar, challenged a preventive detention order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material to Show Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 as 'cruel person' set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Mohammad Saddam Mohammadaasif Kureshi, was preventively detained by an order dated 23.01.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Ah...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay and Lack of Public Order Element. Single Crime and In-Camera Statements Insufficient to Justify Preventive Detention Under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

The petitioner, Umesh Shivaji Vetal, challenged an order of detention dated 09.06.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Ahilyanagar, under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Detention order set aside as the detaining authority failed to consider the petitioner's bail status and relied on stale material.

The petitioner, Asif Shaikh, challenged an order dated 22nd June 2023 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, detaining him under Section 3(2) o...