Search Results for "Plaint averments"

1977 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1977 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Injunction Suit — Rejection of Plaint Set Aside. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Limitation Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC.

The appellant, M/s. Shree Garodi Steels, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the respondent, M/s. Yojaka India Private Ltd., in O.S. No. 739...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Injunction Suit, Remands Case for Fresh Consideration on Possession and Title. Trial court's dismissal of suit and decree of counter claim set aside due to improper appreciation of evidence.

The appellant, P V Kamesh Kumar, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application in Property Suit — Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Limitation.

The present appeal arises from a property dispute over Plot No. 1480 in Ulhasnagar, Maharashtra. The appellants, original defendants, challenged the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Plaint in Eviction Suit. Amendment to Clarify Property Description Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC as No Prejudice Caused to Tenant.

The petitioner, M/s K.T. Kubal & Company, was a tenant in a building owned by the respondent, Mujibur Rehman Haji Israr Alam Siddiqui. The respondent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Applications to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Suit for Injunction and Possession. Court Holds That Defendant Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance and That the Trial Court's Discretion Was Not Erroneous.

The case arises from a civil revision application filed by the original defendant No.1, Balkrishna Zawar, challenging a common order dated 5 March 201...