Search Results for "MRTU & PULP Act, 1971"

523 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 523 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses University's Writ Petitions Challenging Industrial Court's Interim Relief Orders in Service Disputes. Held that Industrial Court has jurisdiction to grant interim relief under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University and its Vice-Chancellor filed four writ petitions (WP Nos. 2966/2011, 2967/2011, 2968/2011, 2969/20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trade Union's Petition Seeking Recovery of Interim Wage Order Under Section 50 of MRTU & PULP Act. Section 50 Recovery Only Available for Final Orders Under Chapter VI, Not Interim Orders Under Section 30.

The petitioner, a trade union registered under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (MRTU &...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals of Retired Employees Against Cooperative Bank's SARFAESI Recovery Proceedings. Employees Held Not to Be 'Borrowers' and Lack Locus Standi to Challenge Auction Sale Without Payment of Dues.

The judgment pertains to a batch of Letters Patent Appeals filed by retired employees of Shamrao Vithal Cooperative Bank Ltd. against the dismissal of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows BEST's Petition Against Industrial Court Order on Unfair Labour Practices — Increments and Leave Benefits for Daily Wagers Upheld Under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking (BEST), challenged a judgment and order dated 17th October 2019 passed by the Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Remand Order by Appellate Authority Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Section 7(8) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Does Not Confer Power to Remand; Appellate Authority Must Decide Appeal on Merits.

The petitioner, Dr. Gajanan Vithoba Jain, a former employee of the respondent-management running Shiv Vaibhav College of Education, Wardha, filed an a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging Labour Court's Finding on Majority Union. Membership Verification by Labour Court is Final and Binding on Employer and Rival Union.

The case involves a dispute between two trade unions, Akhil Dadra & Nagar Haveli Kamgar Sangh (appellant in LPA 197/2008) and Krantikari Kamgar Union ...