High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Regularization of Temporary Lecturers Under University of Mysore Statutes, 2004. Petitioners Seek Absorption and Regularization in Permanent Teaching Posts.
23 Apr 2019...
Search Results for "Kerala Buildings Act"
396 result(s) found
Found 396 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines MCD's Recovery Notices Against MEPIDL for Territorial Overreach. Cross-Petitions on Attachment of Assets Outside Delhi Under DMC Act, 1957.
1 Feb 2023The dispute arose from a contract dated 28th September 2017 between MEP Infrastructure Developers Limited (MEPIDL), a Mumbai-based enterprise, and the...
- 86
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating ST Certificate for Lack of Affinity Test. Caste Claim as 'Thakur' (ST) Upheld as Contemporaneous Documentary Evidence Outweighs Affinity Test Under Maharashtra Act XXIII of 2001.
1 Aug 2018The petitioner, Monika Sunil Shinde, a 19-year-old resident of Ahmednagar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challe...
- 97
High Court
Madras High Court Upholds Denial of Ordinary Leave to Convicts in Multiple Cases Due to Adverse Police Reports. Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Leave for Convicts Convicted of Heinous Offences, Holding That Prison Authorities' Discretion Under Tamil Nadu Prison Rules Must Be Exercised Based on Objective Assessment of Threat to Public Order.
28 Apr 2026The judgment involves four writ petitions filed by family members of convicts seeking ordinary leave for the convicts. The petitioners are Rajammal (m...
- 108
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Appeal Against Trial Court's Refusal to Cancel a Conveyance Deed in a Trust Property Dispute. The Appeal Challenges the Declaration that the Ante-dated Deed Is Inoperative Only to the Extent It Affects Trust Rights, Rather than Cancelling It Entirely.
29 Jun 2005The dispute centered on a trust property created by a deed of settlement dated 17 March 1951, with the plaintiff Bomi Munchershaw Mistry as a benefici...
- 52
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement in Commercial Suit — Defendant No. 7 Permitted to Amend Pleadings to Include Additional Grounds of Defence. Amendment Sought to Add Facts Regarding Execution of Agreement and Payment of Consideration, Held Not to Cause Prejudice to Plaintiff as Trial Not Yet Commenced.
30 Nov -0001The present interim application was filed by defendant no.7, Ganesh Lakhaji Chudasama, seeking amendment of his written statement in a commercial suit...
- 125
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Third-Party Shop Owners Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Commercial Construction on Residential Plot. U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad's Demolition Order Upheld as High Court's Directions for Removal of Illegal Construction and Initiation of Criminal/Departmental Proceedings Are Affirmed.
10 Dec 2024The case involves appeals by third-party purchasers of commercial shops constructed on a residential plot originally allotted to Veer Singh by U.P. Av...
- 4386
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against Quashing of Charge Sheet in Disproportionate Assets Case. Re-employment of Retired Police Officer as Joint Director Valid Under Article 162 of Constitution.
6 Dec 2019The Supreme Court dealt with appeals against the High Court's order quashing a charge sheet in a disproportionate assets case under the Prevention of ...
- 187
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Against Railway Land Demolition — No Encroachment Rights on Railway Land. Petitioners failed to establish any legal right to occupy railway land, and the demolition was lawful under the Railways Act, 1989.
19 Mar 2024The petitioners, seven individuals, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the demolition of their structures on land claimed to b...
- 99
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Naval Dockyard Contract Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on extra work and escalation claims as plausible and not perverse under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
17 Sep 2012The Petitioner, Union of India, challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispute arose from a ...
- 83
