Search Results for "Gram Panchayat election"

433 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 433 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Re-investigation in Murder and Atrocity Case. Informant lacks locus standi to seek re-investigation after charge-sheet and trial commencement under Section 173(8) CrPC.

The petitioner, Rajendra @ Raju s/o. Laxman Chandane, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking a directi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Member Under Section 14(1)(h) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959. Failure to Prove Demand and Default Within Three Months Renders Disqualification Invalid.

The petitioner, Vishwanath s/o Kisan Dhage, was elected as a member of Gram Panchayat, Wara Jahangir, in 2015. Respondent No.4, Suresh Ashruji Gawande...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Nomination Objections in Gram Panchayat Elections. Election Dispute Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 - Court Holds That Orders of Returning Officer Are Not Subject to Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226.

The petitioners, Shivaji Laxman Wadkar and Kiran Daulat Gosavi, filed two separate writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India befor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Sarpanch for Son's Encroachment on Government Land. The term 'person' under Section 14(1)(j3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 includes legal representatives of the encroacher.

The petitioner, Sau. Anita Laxman Junghare, was the Sarpanch and a member of Gram Panchayat, Nagapura. Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 filed a complaint alleg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Returning Officer's Rejection of Nomination Paper Over Name Discrepancy in Caste Certificate. The Court Held That an Undertaking Clarifying Maiden Name Due to Marriage is Sufficient, and Rejection Amounts to an Error Apparent on Record, Warranting Intervention Under Article 226.

The petitioner, a homemaker, sought to contest the election for a reserved seat of Scheduled Caste candidate in Ward No. 3 of Gram Panchayat Karli, Ta...