Search Results for "Finance Act 2021 Amendment"

408 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 408 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Confiscation Notice Due to Improper Procedure. Authorities Must Complete Entire Process Under Section 129 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Before Invoking Confiscation Under Section 130, Unless Intention to Evade Tax is Established.

The dispute arose from the detention of a truck transporting metal scrap by the State Tax Officer on November 22, 2023, under Section 129 of the Centr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Amendment to Rule 7(3) and Seniority List in Co-operative Banks. Petitioners Seek Declaration that G.O. and Seniority List are Ultra Vires and Violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioners, employees of various District Central Co-operative Banks, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund in GST Case Based on Department's Affidavit Acknowledging Eligibility — Interest Not Payable Under Amended Section 50(3) of CGST Act, 2017. Petitioner's credit balance never fell below wrongly availed amount, so no interest was due.

The petitioner, Soorajmull Bajinath Private Limited, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 18 August 2021 passed by the Joint Commissioner ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Summary Suit for Recovery of Money. Order 6 Rule 2(3) CPC does not require dates and sums in figures and words in plaint, and Order 37 Rule 2 CPC does not mandate separate verification.

The present Civil Revision Application was filed by the applicants (original defendants) against the order dated 07/11/2022 passed by the 14th Joint C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Regulation of Time Share Companies as Collective Investment Schemes Under SEBI Act. Court Holds That Time Share Arrangements Do Not Constitute Collective Investment Schemes and That Grievances Are Contractual in Nature.

The petitioner, M/s Securities & Time Share Owners Welfare Association, filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the Securities and E...