Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Notice Issued Beyond Time Limit and Without Proper Sanction. Reassessment Notice Quashed as the Assessing Officer Failed to Record Proper Reasons and Obtain Mandatory Approval Under Section 151 of the Act.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, an individual, filed a return of income for Assessment Year 2018-19 on 28 August 2018 declaring total income of Rs.26,26,220/-. Subsequently, the petitioner received a notice dated 28 September 2019 under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 stating that the return was selected for limited scrutiny regarding investments in immovable property and capital gains. Later, the petitioner received a notice dated 12 December 2019 under Section 148 of the Act for reassessment. The petitioner challenged the reassessment notice by way of a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The court examined whether the notice under Section 148 was valid. The court noted that the notice was issued beyond the time limit prescribed under Section 149 of the Act. Additionally, the court found that the Assessing Officer failed to record proper reasons for reopening the assessment and did not obtain the mandatory sanction under Section 151 of the Act. The court held that the reassessment notice was illegal and without jurisdiction. Consequently, the court allowed the writ petition and quashed the notice under Section 148. The court also made the rule absolute and directed the respondents to act accordingly.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Reassessment - Section 148 - Time Limit - Notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for reassessment must be issued within the time limit prescribed under Section 149. In this case, the notice was issued beyond the permissible period, rendering it invalid. (Paras 1-8)

B) Income Tax - Reassessment - Section 151 - Sanction - Prior approval of the specified authority under Section 151 is mandatory before issuing a notice under Section 148. The court found that the sanction was not properly obtained, vitiating the reassessment proceedings. (Paras 1-8)

C) Income Tax - Reassessment - Recording of Reasons - The Assessing Officer must record reasons for reopening an assessment. Failure to do so makes the notice under Section 148 unsustainable. (Paras 1-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reassessment notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was valid when issued beyond the time limit and without proper sanction under Section 151?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition and quashed the notice dated 12 December 2019 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Rule made absolute.

Law Points

  • Reassessment notice under Section 148 must be issued within prescribed time limit
  • Proper sanction under Section 151 is mandatory
  • Failure to record reasons invalidates notice
  • Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 available against illegal reassessment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (02) 215

Writ Petition No. 3246 of 2022

2024-02-13

K. R. Shriram, Dr. Neela Gokhale

2024:BHC-OS:2536-DB

Mr. K. Gopal a/w Ms Neha Paranjpe and Mr. Akhilesh Deshmukh for Petitioner, Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondents

Mira Bhavin Mehta

Income Tax Officer Ward 6 (3) (1) & Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-6

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the reassessment notice dated 12 December 2019 issued under Section 148

Filing Reason

Notice under Section 148 was issued beyond the time limit prescribed under Section 149 and without proper sanction under Section 151

Issues

Whether the reassessment notice under Section 148 was issued within the time limit prescribed under Section 149? Whether the Assessing Officer obtained proper sanction under Section 151 before issuing the notice?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the notice under Section 148 was issued beyond the time limit and without proper sanction. Respondents argued in support of the notice.

Ratio Decidendi

A reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 must be issued within the time limit prescribed under Section 149 and with proper sanction under Section 151. Failure to comply renders the notice invalid and liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard. Petitioner, an individual, filed return of income on 28th August 2018 for AY-2018-19 declaring total income of Rs.26,26,220/-.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed return on 28 August 2018. Received notice under Section 143(2) on 28 September 2019. Received notice under Section 148 on 12 December 2019. Filed writ petition challenging the Section 148 notice.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 143(2), 148, 149, 151
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Husband and Relatives in Domestic Violence Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. FIR registered at Tasgaon Police Station for alleged offences under Sections 498A, 406, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 an...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition Declaring Dismissal Void for Breach of Section 33(1)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act — Employer Dismissed Workman During Pending Conciliation Without Prior Permission. The court held that the order of dismissal passe...