Search Results for "Export company"

937 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 937 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Includability of Bought-Out Items in Assessable Value of CKD Boilers. Appeal Under Section 35L(1)(b) of Central Excise Act, 1944 Challenges CESTAT Order Holding That Essential Parts Delivered at Site Must Be Included in Transaction Value for Duty Assessment.

The Supreme Court heard statutory appeals under Section 35L(1)(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the common final order of the Customs, Excis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing and Inventory Valuation Case. Management fees paid to associated enterprise held allowable as services rendered and benefit derived; provision for obsolete inventory allowed following Rotork Controls.

The appeal was filed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Pune under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 14th June, 201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Market Committee's Petition Challenging Quashing of Market Fee Demand on Processed Chicken. Processing of Chicken Does Not Constitute 'Sale' of Agricultural Produce Under the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

The petitioners, Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Panvel, and its Chairman, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Customs Licence for Export Oriented Unit Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Licence under Section 58(1) of Customs Act, 1962 cancelled without proper show cause notice and without considering reply, set aside with restoration of licence.

The petitioner, Sarla Performance Fibers Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, was engaged in the manufacture of synthetic yarn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses PIL Challenging State's Interpretation of Supreme Court Order Allowing Post-Deadline Transportation. The Petitioner Contends That the Supreme Court's Order Under Article 142 Permitted Only Excavation Till 15 March 2018 and Not Post-Deadline Transportation.

The Goa Foundation, a public interest organization, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the State Government's decisi...