Search Results for "Development Control Regulation"

1578 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1578 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Import Restriction for Areca Nuts — Condition Requiring NOC from FSSAI Held Ultra Vires. Import Policy Condition Violates Article 19(1)(g) and Article 14 of Constitution as It Lacks Statutory Authority and Is Disproportionate.

The petitioner, Siddhi Vinayak, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1913, engaged in the import of areca nuts (commonly kn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Seed Inspector's Entry and Seizure Without Authorization Under Seeds Act, 1966. Entry and seizure of seeds from storage area without prior authorization under Section 14 of Seeds Act, 1966 held illegal and without jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in the business of research, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Appoints Expert Commission in Sewage Nuisance Case Against Municipal Council and Developer. The Court Held That Occupation Certificate Cannot Be Issued Without Sewerage Compliance, Recognizing Violations of Articles 14, 21, and 300A of the Constitution of India.

The writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay arose from a sewage nuisance caused to an agriculturist's land by a high-rise resident...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Filed by Sugar Factories and Distilleries Against State of Maharashtra Regarding Excise Transport Fees. Petitioners Challenged Validity of Transport Fee Demands Under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949.

The Bombay High Court, in exercise of its civil appellate jurisdiction, adjudicated a batch of fifty-one writ petitions filed by various sugar factori...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ of Quo Warranto Against Electricity Ombudsman for Lack of Standing. Petitioner failed to establish that the appointment of respondent no.2 was illegal or that he had a superior right to the post under the Electricity Act, 2003 and MERC Regulations, 2006.

The petitioner, Amol Prabhakar Joshi, a retired Secretary to the Government of Maharashtra, filed a writ petition seeking a writ of quo warranto again...