Search Results for "Common Guidelines 2008"

908 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 908 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses University's Challenge to Reinstatement of Temporary Employees in Termination Dispute. Termination of Employees Without Prior Approval Under Section 58 of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 Held Illegal.

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by Solapur University challenging a common order of the College Tribunal, Mumbai, dated 10 January 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Head Constables in Promotion Dispute — Rules 2010 Notified After Vacancy Cannot Deny Promotion. Educational Qualification for Promotion to ASI-Executive Must Be Possessed at Time of Promotion, Not Initial Appointment, Under 2008 Rules and Standing Order.

The case involves a dispute among Head Constables of the Andaman & Nicobar Police Department regarding promotion to the post of Assistant Sub-Inspecto...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of Air India's Standing Order 17 Which Permits Termination Without Assigning Reasons. The Court Considered Whether Such Unguided Power Violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed by employees of Air India Limited (formerly NACIL) whose services were terminated under Standing Ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Suit for Specific Performance After Trial Commenced — Amendment Sought After Cross-Examination of Plaintiff's Witness Held Not Barred by Proviso to Order VI Rule 17 CPC as Trial Had Not Concluded and Amendment Was Necessary for Determining Real Controversy

The petitioner, Walchandnagar Industries Limited, the original defendant No.1, challenged an order dated 28-11-2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 6608 OF 2016

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Judgments on Creamy Layer Determination for OBC Reservation in Civil Services. Inclusion of Salary Income for PSU Employees Under Category II(C) of Office Memorandum Dated 08.09.1993 Found Discriminatory and Set Aside Due to Violation of Article 14.

The Supreme Court dealt with three consolidated civil appeals arising from separate High Court judgments concerning the determination of creamy layer ...