Search Results for "window period"

586 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 586 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Promotion Rule of Forest Development Corporation Requiring Departmental Exam, Dismisses RFO's Petition. Rule 3(1) Providing Different Deadlines for Existing and Future Officers Held Non-Discriminatory as Multiple Opportunities Given and Seniority Not Sole Basis.

The dispute arose when a Range Forest Officer employed with the Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. (F.D.C.M.) challenged his supersess...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeal Under Section 14 of Admiralty Act Against Single Judge Order Dismissing Defendant's Notice of Motion. The dispute concerned breach of a bareboat charterparty and a subsequent time charterparty regarding a vessel.

The original plaintiff, Siem Offshore Rederi AS, a Norwegian company, filed Admiralty Suit (L) No. 20 of 2018 before the Bombay High Court against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.2063 OF 2025

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Trust's Challenge to Land Acquisition for Market Yard Due to Delay and Laches. Challenge to Preliminary Notification Under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Filed After Over a Year Held Not Maintainable.

The Jamnalal Bajaj Seva Trust filed two writ petitions challenging the acquisition of its land by the State of Karnataka for the benefit of the Agricu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission's Order on Maintainability of Settlement Application Under Section 32E of Central Excise Act, 1944 — Holds That Order of Adjudication Is Made on Date of Dispatch, Not Date of Signing

The petitioner, M/s. Vishnu Steels, a manufacturer of excisable goods, challenged an order of the Settlement Commission dismissing its application und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Allows Appeal Against Admission of CIRP Due to Discharge of Debt Through One-Time Settlement. Financial Debt Found to Be Fully Satisfied Prior to Filing of Section 7 Application Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

The present appeal was filed under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) by Mr. Puneet Resutra, the erstwhile Director and Shar...