Search Results for "residential complex"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "residential complex"

616 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 616 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Addresses Writ Petitions Challenging Dismissal and CGIT Order in BEL Strike Case. Allegations of Abusive Conduct and Obstruction During Strike Result in Dismissal Under Certified Standing Orders.

11 Oct 2019

The workman, formerly an Accountant at Bharat Electronics Limited, was dismissed from service following a strike on 11 December 2013. He joined the co...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petitions Challenging Dismissal of Workman and Tribunal's Order in Industrial Dispute; Outcome Not Specified

11 Oct 2019

The workman, employed as an Accountant since 1995 and later promoted, was an active union member. On 25.11.2013, a strike notice under Section 22(1)(B...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Reserves Decision on Quashing of Multiple FIRs in Real Estate Dispute; Developers Contend Breach of Contract, Not Cheating. Court Examines Whether Civil Dispute Can Attract Criminal Liability Under Sections 406 and 420 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

21 Oct 2024

The Karnataka High Court heard a batch of criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of mult...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Batch of Petitions Seeking to Quash Private Complaint and FIR for Offences Under Sections 354A, 500, 506, 120B IPC. Multiple Accused Challenge the Proceedings as Abuse of Process of Law.

9 Aug 2024

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Challenges to De-Notification Under Slum Act — Petitioners Assert Right to Compensation After Possession Taken. The petitions raised questions on the validity of withdrawal of acquisition proceedings under the Karnataka Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1956, and the applicability of Article 300-A of the Constitution.

27 Sep 2024

The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, delivered a CAV order on 27 September 2024 in two connected writ petitions, WP No. 101473/2023 and WP No. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Reviews Challenge to CRZ-II Reclassification of Coastal Stretches in Dona Paula and Surrounding Areas. Petitioners Allege Reclassification from CRZ-III to CRZ-II Undermines Environmental Protection and Serves Hotel and Builder Lobbies, Affecting Green Cover and Ecology.

10 Dec 2010

The matter concerns a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by two residents of La Oceana Colony, Dona Paula, Goa, agains...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Public Premises Act Case — Prima Facie Satisfaction Sufficient for Eviction Notice. The Court held that the Estate Officer's satisfaction under Section 4(1) of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 need only be prima facie based on material on record, and the appellate court cannot substitute its own findings at the notice stage.

10 May 2024

The case involves a civil revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by a government company (wholly owned by ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Landowner's Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Development Agreement Validity. Clause 18 of Development Agreement Held as Valid Arbitration Agreement Under Section 7 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Reversing High Court's Dismissal of Section 11 Application.

7 Sep 2022

The dispute originated from a Development Agreement dated 29.05.2014 between the appellant landowner and respondent developer for construction of an a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Refund to Flat Purchaser for Inordinate Delay in Possession — Builder's Unfair Contract Terms Not Binding. Builder's failure to apply for occupancy certificate within stipulated time constitutes deficiency of service; one-sided clauses in Apartment Buyer's Agreement are unfair and not binding under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

2 Apr 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals filed by Pioneer Urban Land & Infrastructure Ltd. against orders of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Developer's Appeals in Consumer Disputes Over Delayed Possession — Compensation Modified to 9% Interest Per Annum in Line with Consent Orders. The Court held that the developer is entitled to a three-year completion period and compensation for delay shall be at a uniform rate of 9% per annum, not the higher rates awarded by the NCDRC.

10 May 2019

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of civil appeals arising from orders of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) concerning d...

30 31 32 33 34

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)