Search Results for "land use regulation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "land use regulation"

1291 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1291 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Excess One-Time Premium in ULC Act Repeal Case — Premium Chargeable Only on Exempted Surplus Vacant Land. The court held that the one-time premium under the 2019 GR and 2021 GR cannot be levied on retainable land, only on exempted surplus land under Section 20 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.

7 Aug 2024

The petitioners, owners of land bearing Survey No.429/1/2 and CTS No.1069-A/A-1 and 1069-A/B-1, sought a refund of Rs.2,66,75,750/- paid as one-time p...

Supreme Court

Presidential Reference Made to Supreme Court Seeks Advisory Opinion on Telecom Licences and Spectrum Allocation Policies. Reference Under Article 143(1) Recites Historical Grant of Licences from 1994 to 2008 Including First-Come-First-Served and Revenue Share Regimes.

12 Apr 2012

Background: The President of India made a reference under Article 143(1) of the Constitution on 12.04.2012, seeking the advisory opinion of the Suprem...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds SEBI's Order Against Kotak Mutual Fund for Violating SEBI Circular on Side Pocketing of Debt Securities. The Court held that the creation of segregated portfolios without complying with the mandatory conditions of the SEBI circular dated 28th December 2018 was impermissible, and the fund managers and trustees were liable for the resulting losses.

13 Jul 2026

The case involves appeals by Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited (Kotak AMC), Kotak Mahindra Trustee Company Limited, and several senior e...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Land Acquisition for Private Companies Due to Lack of Public Purpose and Favoritism. State's Exercise of Eminent Domain Found to be Misused for Allocating Valuable Land to Private Entities Without Legitimate Industrial Development Goals.

27 Feb 2026

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a writ appeal challenging a single judge's order dated 06.03.2013 in W.P.No.17211/2009. The appeal was ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses State Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case; Upholds Enhanced Compensation Based on Comparable Sale Instances and Rejects State's Contentions on Agricultural Land and Tenant Status.

10 Aug 2017

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard a first appeal filed by the State against the judgment and award of the Reference Court enhancing land acquisiti...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes State Order Permitting Non-Forest Use of Reserved Forest Without Central Approval. Section 28 of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 Cannot Override Section 2 of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980.

4 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Gireesh Achar, filed a public interest litigation under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 2...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.4044 OF 2015

19 May 2015

These are a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction. The petitioners are various tra...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Admits Appeals from City Civil Court Order in Membership Cancellation Dispute. Decision Involves Interpretation of Club Regulations and Articles of Association Regarding Eligibility of Founder Members' Kin.

3 Jul 2006

The appeals arose from a common judgment dated February 22, 2006, passed by the City Civil Court, Mumbai in S.C. Suit No. 5154 of 2005, where the orig...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Competent Authority's Orders Under MOFA, 1963 — Orders Quashed for Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. The Competent Authority under Section 5A of MOFA, 1963 cannot adjudicate title or possession of land, and must follow principles of natural justice.

18 Apr 2024

The judgment involves two writ petitions: Writ Petition No. 180 of 2018 filed by Marathon Era Co-operative Housing Society Ltd and Writ Petition No. 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule M-3 of DCPR for Satara Region as Ultra Vires. Rule requiring 12m wide access road for plot subdivision is a valid development control regulation under MRTP Act, 1966 and does not amount to uncompensated acquisition.

23 Mar 2022

The petitioners, Suhas Shridhar Shahane and Subhash Kondiram Sawant, landowners in Satara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

30 31 32 33 34

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)