Search Results for "interest pendente lite"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "interest pendente lite"

322 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 322 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Maintenance to Wife Despite Husband's Claim of Talaq in Restitution of Conjugal Rights Proceedings. Mere assertion of divorce does not defeat wife's claim for interim maintenance; husband must prove factum of divorce.

12 Aug 2010

The petitioner-husband and respondent-wife were married on 22.12.2006 under Islamic Law. The wife filed Petition No. A889/2008 before Family Court No....

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree Against Tenant for Non-User and Landlord's Bonafide Requirement Under Bombay Rent Act. Tenant's occasional use of premises does not constitute continuous residence; landlord's need for own use justified eviction.

12 Nov 2025

The dispute arises from a suit for eviction filed by the landlord (respondent) against the tenant (petitioner) under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodgi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Mortgagee Bank to Fund Essential Supplies to Arrested Vessel Pending Judicial Sale — Priority of Supply Claims as Sheriff's Expenses. The court held that the mortgagee bank must bear the cost of preserving the arrested vessel and such expenses rank first in priority over all other claims.

11 Feb 2014

The Plaintiff, Coromandel International Limited, filed an Admiralty Suit against the vessel m.v. GLORY I and its owners, Andromeda Ship Holdings Ltd.,...

High Court

Parsi Chief Matrimonial Court Holds That Evidence in Parsi Divorce Suits May Be Recorded Before a Commissioner Under CPC Order 18 Rule 4(2) — Section 46 of Parsi Marriage & Divorce Act, 1936 Does Not Mandate In-Court Recording with Delegates.

3 Apr 2014

The case involved a suit filed under the Parsi Marriage & Divorce Act, 1936, by Rohinton Panthaky against Armin R. Panthaky. During the proceedings, a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC where courts below concurrently found that plaintiffs failed to prove title and possession.

26 Jul 2022

The appellants, legal representatives of the original plaintiffs, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, agains...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Compromise Decree in Title Suit Due to Fraud and Fabrication — Lok Adalat Decree Set Aside as Collusive and Without Proper Verification. Compromise Decree Obtained by Fraud is a Nullity and Can Be Challenged Under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

4 Jun 2021

The petitioner, Smt. Padmavati, originally filed a writ petition challenging a compromise decree dated 27.09.2010 passed in O.S. No.243 of 2010 on the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Set Aside Ex Parte Decree in Money Suit — Service of Summons Valid Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. The court held that the defendant had knowledge of the suit and failed to show sufficient cause for non-appearance, upholding the ex parte decree.

14 Nov 2017

The appellant, M/s. CliniRX Research Pvt. Ltd., was the original defendant in a money suit filed by the respondent, Bicare Limited, for recovery of mo...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Husband's Appeal Against Permanent Alimony Order in Divorce Case — Reduces Alimony from Rs. 5 Lakhs to Rs. 3 Lakhs Considering Husband's Limited Income and Wife's Earning Capacity. The court held that the quantum of permanent alimony must be just and fair, taking into account the income of both parties, the duration of marriage, and the wife's earning capacity under Section 37 of the Divorce Act, 1869.

13 Jul 2017

The appellant-husband, Sri Daniel Anand, and the respondent-wife, Smt. G.N. Sujatha, were married on 28.12.2006 according to Christian customary rites...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Civil Revision Petition in Land Acquisition Compensation Execution Case — Limitation Period for Filing Execution Petition Computed from Date of Final Decree, Not Dismissal of Prior Execution Petition. The court held that an execution petition filed within 12 years from the date of the decree under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963, cannot be dismissed as time-barred merely because a prior execution petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.

28 Jul 2016

The case pertains to a civil revision petition filed by the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner, Sri Mariyappa, challenging an order date...

High Court

Madras High Court Decides Second Appeal Challenging Concurrent Decrees of Lower Courts. The Appeal Filed Under Section 100 of CPC Arose from Suit No.414 of 1994, and the High Court Delivered Judgment on 14 July 2026.

14 Jul 2026

...

30 31 32 33

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)