Search Results for "double recovery"

589 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 589 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Recovery of Articles. Accused's Guilt Established Through Motive, Last Seen, and Recovery of Stolen Property Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, a labourer working at the farmhouse of Mr. Jose Kafan (deceased), was convicted by the High Court of Karnataka for the murder of the de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Robbery Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Accused convicted under Sections 302 and 397 IPC for murder of aunt during robbery, with chain of circumstances establishing guilt.

The appellant, Ganesh Bhau Sonawane, was convicted by the Sessions Court at Sewree for the murder of his aunt, Laxmibai Narayankar, and for robbery of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR in Partnership and Work Execution Dispute Holding It Essentially Civil. Criminal Proceedings for Cheating and Trespass Found to Be Abuse of Process; Dispute Purely Civil in Nature and Does Not Attract Sections 420, 448, 506, 34 IPC.

The petitioners, accused in FIR No.154/2021, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution read with Section 482 CrPC seeking t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Reference for Confirmation of Death Sentence in Double Murder-Robbery Case. Conviction Under Sections 302, 307, 397, 452, 460 IPC for Fatally Attacking Housewife and Child During Robbery.

The case before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, arose out of a reference for confirmation of death sentence under Section 366 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court Order Returning Plaint for Want of Pecuniary Jurisdiction in Suit for Injunction and Damages. The Court Held That for Order VII Rule 11 CPC, Only Plaint Averments Are Relevant, Not Evidence.

The appellant, Bharat Bhushan Gupta, filed a suit for mandatory and prohibitory injunction and recovery of damages against the respondents, Pratap Nar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 307 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Tilakchand and Hanaslal Biranwar, were convicted by the 1st Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Gondia, for offences under Sections 307 ...