Search Results for "court stay exclusion"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "court stay exclusion"

742 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 742 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Execution Petition in Limitation Dispute — Decree Merger with Appellate Decree Determines Starting Point for Article 136 Limitation Act, 1963. Doctrine of merger applied to hold that limitation for execution runs from date of appellate decree, not trial court decree.

9 Mar 2010

The case involves a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the executing court dismissing the petitioner...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Orders on Limitation Act Applicability to RDDBFI Act Appeals. Court Holds Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies to Appeals Under Section 30 of RDDBFI Act, Rejecting Petitioners' Argument That Special Statute Excludes Limitation Act.

13 Oct 2011

The petitioners, owners of apartments in Jupiter Complex, Nagpur, challenged orders of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and Debts Recovery Appellate ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Tender Dispute, Quashing High Court's Order and Permitting Project Completion. The Court held that judicial review in tender matters is limited to examining legality under Article 14 of the Constitution, and interference is unwarranted unless the decision is manifestly arbitrary, unjust, or mala fide, as per Tata Cellular v. Union of India.

21 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from a tender process initiated by the Road Construction Department of Jharkhand for the reconstruction of Nagaruntari–Dhurki–Am...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tender Cancellation and Rejection of Highest Bid in Municipal Contract for Construction of Shopping Complex. Court holds that the Municipal Council's decision to cancel the tender and reject the highest bid was arbitrary, unreasonable, and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution, as the bidder was not given an opportunity to explain the alleged discrepancy in the bid document.

6 May 2022

The petitioner, Khilari Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., challenged the decision of the Osmanabad Municipal Council (Respondent No. 5) to cancel the tender p...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Regarding Liability for Defects in Gas Turbine Generators. Award Deals with Claims for Damages Due to Breakdown and Repair Costs Under a Turnkey Contract.

9 Dec 2025

The dispute arises from a contract between Thermax Limited (Petitioner) and Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. (Respondent) for the turnkey instal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit Challenging Compulsory Purchase Order Under Income Tax Act. Suit Seeking Declaration That Compulsory Purchase Order Stood Abrogated Was Barred by Section 269-UN and Section 293 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, Which Exclude Civil Court Jurisdiction.

25 Apr 2025

The appeal was filed against the order dated 7th April 2014 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing the plaintiff's suit ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order to Try Jurisdiction as Preliminary Issue in Contract Dispute. Exclusive jurisdiction clause in contract designating Mumbai courts does not automatically oust territorial jurisdiction of Aurangabad court without proper adjudication.

13 Dec 2022

The petitioner, M/s Ghai Construction, filed a suit (Spl. C. S. No. 276 of 2009) in the Civil Court at Aurangabad for recovery of Rs. 652.06 Lakhs fro...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Public Interest Litigation on Railway Double Tracking Permissions. The Petitioners Contended That Railway Authorities Must Obtain Prior Permissions Under Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, Town and Country Planning Act, 1974, Irrigation Act, 1973, Land Revenue Code, 1968 and CRZ Notification, 2011, and That Section 11 of Railways Act, 1989 Does Not Exempt Such Permissions.

3 Aug 2022

By way of a public interest litigation, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, and three residents of Guirdolim, Chandor and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Arbitration Application Under SARFAESI Act Between Secured Creditor and Prospective Secured Creditor Over Title Documents Dispute. The court held that a dispute between a secured creditor and an entity prevented from becoming a secured creditor due to refusal to hand over title documents is arbitrable under Section 11 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.

6 May 2026

The case involves a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Aditya Birla Housing Finance Limited (Applicant)...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Addresses Challenge to National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET) Notifications for Medical Admissions. The court examines the regulatory power of medical councils and the impact on minority educational institutions under Articles 19(1)(g) and 30 of the Constitution.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of writ petitions and transferred cases challenging four notifications issued by the Medical Council of India...

30 31 32 33 34

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)