Search Results for "Speedy Adjudication"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Speedy Adjudication"

333 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 333 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal Against High Court Order Permitting Recall of Prosecutrix for Cross-Examination in Rape Case. Section 311 CrPC Recall Allowed Only if Testimony is Essential for Just Decision and Not to Fill Gaps in Defence.

1 Jan 2026

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the High Court of Tripura which set aside the Trial Court's order rejecting an application under Section ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Under Section 37(1)(a) of Arbitration Act Against Rejection of Section 8 Application in Salary Recovery Suit. Employer's Application for Reference to Arbitration Allowed as Employment Contract Contained Arbitration Clause.

5 Nov 2020

The respondent, Mohan Kumar Thakur, filed a suit for recovery of salary dues and other amounts totaling Rs. 66,13,717/- with interest against his empl...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163A MV Act — No Defence of Contributory Negligence Available in Structured Formula Claims. Insurer Liable to Pay Compensation Despite Alleged Negligence of Deceased as Section 163A is a No-Fault Liability Scheme.

28 Apr 2020

The appeal arises out of a judgment and award dated 20.06.2013 in M.V.C.No.301/2011 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge & M.A.C.T., Puttur, D.K...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Public Premises Act — Petitioner's Title and Possession Established Through Registered Sale Deeds and Mutation Entries. The Court Held That the Estate Officer Cannot Summarily Evict a Person Claiming Lawful Title Without Proper Adjudication Under Section 5-A(2) of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971.

1 Mar 2018

The petitioner, Shri Prashant Vinodkumar Bansal, filed a Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and ord...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Subjective Satisfaction. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Grounds Were Stale and Irrelevant, Violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India.

29 Jan 2018

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Ganesh Narayan Mane, challenged the detention order dated 08.09.2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in Foreign Award Enforcement. Court holds that under the amended Section 2(1)(e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, only the High Court having jurisdiction over the subject matter of the award can entertain interim measures, not any court where assets are located.

9 Oct 2017

The petitioner, Trammo DMCC, a company incorporated in the UAE, obtained a foreign arbitral award against the respondent, Nagarjuna Fertilizers and Ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Notification Excluding Port Trust Employees from Minimum Wages Act Provisions. The notification dated 15/03/2002 exempting employees from Section 2(h), Section 14 of Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and Rule 25 of Minimum Wages (Central) Rules, 1950 was held ultra vires as not issued by appropriate government.

6 Jul 2017

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Mumbai Port Trust Flotilla Worker's Association and Mumbai Port Trust, Dock and General Employees' U...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Negligence Not Required for Structured Compensation. Court holds that for claims under Section 163-A, the claimant need not prove negligence; the 'arising out of use' requirement is satisfied if the vehicle was involved in the accident, even if the collision was not the direct cause of death.

27 Jun 2017

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the parents and sister of Dinesh Kadam, a 22-year-old lift mechanic who died on 11 April 2007 aft...

30 31 32 33 34

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)