Search Results for "Section 160 Evidence Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Section 160 Evidence Act"

846 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 846 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Appeals in Gang Rape Case; Convicts Challenge Conviction and State Seeks Enhancement of Sentence. Accused Were Convicted Under Sections 376(2)(g) and 366 IPC for Gang Rape of Two Minor Girls and Sentenced to 10 Years Rigorous Imprisonment.

21 Nov 2017

Criminal appeals arising from the judgment of the Sessions Court, Parbhani, in Sessions Case No. 121 of 1994 were taken up by the High Court of Judica...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Auction of Property Under MPID Act — Petitioner Cannot Challenge Auction After Being Declared Successful Bidder. Court Held That Petitioner's Own Conduct of Participating in Auction with Knowledge of Attachments and Seeking Specific Performance Before MPID Court Precludes Challenge Under Article 226.

25 Oct 2024

The petitioner, Lemon Seeds Hospitality Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Order in Industrial Dispute — Petitioners Failed to Establish Employer-Employee Relationship. The Court upheld the Labour Court's finding that the petitioners were not workmen under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as they were engaged as independent contractors for distribution of newspapers.

30 Aug 2024

The judgment involves a batch of 20 writ petitions filed by individuals claiming to be workmen of Lokmat Media Private Limited. The petitioners, repre...

High Court

Bombay High Court Admits Central Excise Appeal on Conditional Exemption and Cenvat Credit. The Appeal Raises Substantial Questions of Law Regarding Notification No.6/2006-C.E. and Credit on Aggregates Used in Export.

9 Sep 2014

The Bombay High Court heard a central excise appeal filed by Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. against the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-V. The appell...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.853 OF 2012

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Compensation Award — Petitioners' Claim for Enhanced Compensation Rejected as They Failed to Prove Entitlement Under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court held that the petitioners did not make a valid application under Section 28-A within the limitation period and that the writ petition was not maintainable due to alternative remedy.

7 Jul 2022

The petitioners, Sunil Radhesham Shukla and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court,...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Order in AIADMK Internal Dispute — Interim Injunction Denied for Party Meetings. Court holds that temporary injunction in political party affairs requires strict compliance with CPC principles and balance of convenience.

27 Sep 2022

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals arising from interim orders in civil suits concerning the internal management of the All India Anna D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Reference — Enhances Compensation for Acquired Land. Court holds that the Reference Court erred in not considering the potential value of the land and the sale instances of comparable lands, leading to inadequate compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

20 Jan 2006

The appellant, Eknath B. Pisal, owned land bearing Gat No. 239 admeasuring 1 hectare 20R and 3R Potkharab land at village Shirval, Taluka Khandala, wh...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds CBI Arrest of Chief Minister in Excise Policy Corruption Case, Denies Bail Due to Gravity of Offence. Arrest under Section 41(1)(b)(ii) CrPC valid despite non-issuance of notice under Section 41A as accused was already in judicial custody; High Court's direction to approach trial court for bail not erroneous.

13 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by Arvind Kejriwal challenging his arrest by the CBI and denial of regular bail in connection with the Excise Poli...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Partially Allows Appeal by Land Acquisition Officer in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Reduces Enhanced Compensation from Rs.160 to Rs.80 per sqm Due to Inadequate Deductions for Development Charges. The court held that the Reference Court erred in relying on sale instances without proper comparability evidence and in making only 5% deduction for development, warranting a 50% deduction.

16 Jul 2020

The Land Acquisition Officer (LAO) appealed against the judgment and award of the Reference Court (District Judge-2, Panaji) dated 29 October 2015 in ...

30 31 32 33 34

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)