Search Results for "Prior User"

1084 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1084 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cancellation of Trademark 'PAXIL' for Non-Use Under Section 47 of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Petitioner's Global Reputation and Prior Use Established 'Person Aggrieved' Status.

The Petitioner, Glaxo Group Limited, a global pharmaceutical company, filed a petition under Section 47 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 seeking cancellat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC020032022013_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Heard PIL Challenging Development Permissions for Star Hotel in No Development Zone. The Court Considered Whether UDD Approval Under Regulation 59(3) and Additional FSI of 1.0 Were Valid Under DCRs and MRTP Act.

The case arose from a public interest litigation filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Wakf Property Dispute — Suit Land Declared Wakf Property Based on Historical Evidence of Use as Burial Ground. High Court Erred in Reversing Single Judge's Finding That Land Was Wakf Property Under Wakf Act, 1995.

The appeals arise from a judgment of the Madras High Court which set aside the decree of the Single Judge declaring the suit land as wakf property. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Plaintiffs in Property Declaration Suit Due to Omission of Possession Relief. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Held Not Maintainable Under Section 34 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 as Plaintiff, Not in Possession, Failed to Seek Further Relief of Possession.

The dispute originated from a suit filed in 1987 by Arakeri Abbaiah, the original plaintiff, seeking declaration of ownership and permanent injunction...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty Orders for Unauthorized Minor Mineral Extraction Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Show cause notices and final orders under Section 48(7) and (8) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 set aside for non-compliance with principles of natural justice.

The petitioners, M/s. Royale Urbanspace and its partners, owned land bearing Survey No.44/1 at Mouje Borsheti, Taluka Shahapur, District Thane. In 201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Tahsildar's Order Levying Royalty on Excavated Material for Construction. Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Empower Tahsildar to Levy Royalty on Material Excavated for Building Foundation or Plinth.

The petitioner, P.S.C. Pacific, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 11/8/2010...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tahsildar's Demand for Royalty on Excavated Material During Construction. Held that Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty on material excavated pursuant to valid development permission under MRTP Act and NA permission under MLR Code.

The petitioner, originally Flagship Infrastructure Pvt Ltd and now Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Limited, filed a writ petition challenging a show ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Material from Development Site. Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 for excavation during construction pursuant to valid development permission.

The petitioner, Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Ltd., a company engaged in real estate development, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Cour...