Search Results for "Prevention of Corruption Act"

461 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 461 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d)(ii) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Pradeep H. Harwalkar, a Junior Passenger Assistant with Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd., was convicted by the Special Court for CBI in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Dattatraya Jagannathrao Zombade, was convicted by the Special Judge, Osmanabad, for offences under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Prosecution Failed to Establish Demand and Acceptance of Illegal Gratification Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Special Judge, Sindhudurg at Oros, acquitting the respondent, Shridhar Madhavrao Murti, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Reconsideration of Sanction Refusal in Corruption Case Against Police Inspector. Court holds that sanctioning authority must apply its own mind and not rely solely on departmental inquiry findings, and that refusal of sanction must be based on valid reasons and not be arbitrary.

The petitioner, Saddam Shah Khalil Shah Fakir, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging the order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Sanction Order in Corruption Case Against Range Forest Officer — Sanction Granted Without Application of Mind. Sanction under Section 19(1)(b) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sanctioning authority failed to independently consider material evidence.

The petitioner, Rajendra Gangadhar Rane, a Range Forest Officer, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent, Mallinath Rajaram Harsure, who was originally accused No.1 in Special (ACB)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved. Acquittal of Police Head Constable Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Upheld Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the acquittal of Ramesh Tukaram Wagh, a Police Head Constable, in Special Case (PCA) No.4/2012 by the...