Search Results for "Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976"

410 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 410 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MHADA Eviction Order in Slum Rehabilitation Case. Court upholds MHADA's jurisdiction to evict unauthorized occupants from transit accommodation under Section 3M of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Re-development) Act, 1971.

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by 16 individuals who were occupants of transit accommodation in a building known as 'Sukh Sadan' in Go...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging MBRRB Notices and Order in Bhendi Bazar Redevelopment Project. Court upholds validity of notices under Section 95A of MHAD Act and order appointing SBUT as developer, finding no violation of natural justice or statutory provisions.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by occupants of Sardharia Building in Bhendi Bazar, Mumbai, challenging actions of the Bombay Building ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Award for Lack of Notification Under Section 13 of the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999. Acquisition Proceedings for Resettlement of Project-Affected Persons Found Void Due to Non-Declaration of Affected and Benefitted Zones.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by eleven agriculturists whose lands in Bhendegaon Khurd village we...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Case, Restores Reference Court's Compensation with 10% Development Deduction for Hiwra Dam Project. The Court held that for irrigation projects, development deduction should be minimal and unrebutted expert valuation evidence must be considered.

The appeals arose from land acquisition proceedings for the Hiwra Dam project in Maharashtra. The appellant and respondents No.2 and 3 owned a partner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings in Complaint Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Due to Inordinate Delay and Non-Compliance with Mandatory Requirements. Magistrate's Order Without Application of Mind and 14-Year Delay in Investigation Constitute Abuse of Process, Proceedings Quashed Under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

The petitioners, Sayed Anwar Ahmed and Sayed Ghulam Raza Naqvi, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read wit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Cooperative Court Order in Property Dispute. Jurisdiction of Cooperative Court under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 upheld for disputes between society and non-members regarding property.

The petitioner, M/s. Mukund Iron Staff Association Coop. Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Orders Demolition of Illegal Coastal Construction in Public Interest Litigation — Violation of CRZ Regulations and MRTP Act Established. The court found that the construction was carried out without permission and directed demolition within eight weeks.

The Bombay High Court, in a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Bombay Environmental Action Group and another, addressed the issue of illegal cons...