Search Results for "District Grievance Redressal Officer"

359 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 359 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Regularization of Contractual Employee in Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan — No Right to Absorption for Project-Based Appointments. Contractual appointment under a time-bound scheme does not confer any right to regularization or permanent employment.

The petitioner, Jayshree Kolhare, was appointed on a contract basis as a Data Entry Operator under the District Primary Education Program (DPEP) by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition for Regularization of Services and Compassionate Appointment of Deceased Daily Wage Employee. Claim for Regularization Fails as Employee Was Not in Continuous Service for 240 Days and Was Appointed Without Following Recruitment Rules.

The petitioners, legal heirs of late Ningappa Badiger, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking regularization of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging KERC Order Dated 14.05.2018. The Petitioners, Renewable Energy Companies, Seek to Quash the Regulatory Order.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various renewable energy companies, including Renew Power Limited an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Challenge to Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission Order on Wheeling and Banking Charges for Renewable Energy Generators. The court examined the validity of the order dated 14.05.2018 under the Electricity Act, 2003.

A batch of writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India was filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several renewable en...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Forfeiture of Earnest Money in Toll Collection Tender Dispute. Variation in Contract Period from 90 Weeks to 52 Weeks Constitutes Counter-Offer, Not Acceptance, Thus Forfeiture Invalid.

The petitioner, M/s Abhay Construction, a partnership firm, submitted a tender to the Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd. for collecti...