Search Results for "Bharat Infrastructure"

340 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 340 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010137632012_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Service Tax Demand on Payment Aggregator Services for FY 2015-16. Services Provided by FIS Payment Solutions to Acquiring Banks for Settlement of Card Transactions Held Not Taxable as 'Business Auxiliary Service' Under Finance Act, 1994.

The petitioner, FIS Payment Solutions and Services India Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, provides payment aggre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Judgment Debtors' Writ Petitions Challenging Attachment in Execution of Foreign Decree. Court Holds That Objections Under Order 21 Rule 58 CPC Must Be Raised Before Executing Court, Not by Writ Petition.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by judgment debtors challenging the attachment of their property in execution of a foreign decree. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Software Implementation Dispute. Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 invoked due to respondent's failure to appoint arbitrator under agreement dated 30 October 2015.

The applicant, SAP India Private Limited, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging LPG Distributorship Selection by Draw of Lots. Court holds that mere eligibility does not confer right to distributorship and draw of lots is a valid selection method.

The petitioner, Pushpa Vishal Ghuge, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad challenging the selection of respondent No.2, Ja...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in RERA Case for Delay in Possession — Promoter Liable for Interest Under Section 18 of RERA Act, 2016. The court restored the order of TN RERA directing the promoter to pay interest for delay in handing over possession of flat and club house facilities.

The appellant, a retired General Manager of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, entered into a Memorandum of Agreement on 30.07.2011 with the respon...