Search Results for "Arbitration Act, 1940"

463 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 463 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Arbitral Award Passed Outside State — Stamp Duty Payable Only Where Award is Made Under Section 3 of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957. Arbitral Award Made in Mumbai Not Subject to Karnataka Stamp Duty When Sought to be Executed in Karnataka.

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd, a financial institution, entered into a loan agreement with respondents No. 1 and 2. The a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment in Appeal No. 28 of 2002 Arising from Chamber Summons No. 298 of 2001. The Dispute Involves the Validity of Deposit of Decretal Amount and Recording of Satisfaction of Award Following Prothonotary's Refusal.

In 1988, arbitrators passed an award directing Oil & Natural Gas Commission (ONGC) to pay US$1,804.50 and US$59,593 as interest on delayed payments, p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Compensation Dispute. Court upholds award holding that alleged oral settlement was not binding on respondent corporation as officers lacked authority.

The petitioners, M/s. Akbarally's and its partners, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Upholds Execution of Decree Based on Arbitration Award, Declares Eviction Decree Void Under Rent Control Act. Tenant's Objection to Award Validity Precluded After Decree, But Decree Contravening Section 13(1) of Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act, 1952 Held Nullity.

The dispute arose from a landlord-tenant relationship concerning a building in Delhi. The landlord's son resided on the first floor while the tenants ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Condonation of 3014 Days Delay in Filing Appeal — Gross Negligence and Lack of Sufficient Cause. Delay of 3014 days in filing appeal against arbitration order not condoned as applicants failed to explain each day's delay and showed gross negligence.

The applicants, Padmsey Khimji Chheda and another, filed a Notice of Motion seeking condonation of 3014 days delay in filing Appeal (Lodging) No. 569 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Municipal Corporation Against Rejection of Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award. Arbitrator's Findings on Contractual Interpretation and Delay Held Final Under Section 30 of Arbitration Act, 1940.

The appellant, Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, had invited tenders for re-construction of Zakariya Bunder road in May 1989. Respondent no.1 s...