Search Results for "Administrative Tribunal jurisdiction"

2514 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2514 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Tenant's Petition to Withdraw Plea of Permanent Tenancy in Eviction Proceedings. Amendment Sought After 12 Years Held Barred by Laches and Lack of Bona Fides Under G.D.D. Buildings (L.R.E.) Act, 1968.

The petitioner, a tenant, filed writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the order of the Rent Controller, Panaji, dated 23.7....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds That Power Under Section 60 of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 Is Quasi-Judicial and Requires Speaking Orders. The appellate authority must assign reasons while disposing of appeals under Section 60 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951.

The case arose from a reference made by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court (Coram: Nitin Jamdar & Sarang V. Kotwal, JJ.) which did not agree wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Section 36(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Restricting Legal Representation Without Consent. Employer Seeks to Quash Labour Court Order Barring Engagement of Advocate in Industrial Dispute Reference.

The petitioner, a company engaged in manufacturing, dismissed the respondent workman for misconduct after due process in August 2015. The workman rais...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Challenging Appointment of Vice Chancellor of University of Mumbai. Court upholds appointment process under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994, finding no illegality or mala fides.

The judgment pertains to two Public Interest Litigations (PILs) and a Writ Petition challenging the appointment of Dr. Rajan Welukar as the Vice Chanc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Declares Demolition of Shop without Notice Illegal under Section 23 of Karnataka State Highways Act, 1964. Tenant's Possession Protected When Authorities Demolish Building Without Following Procedural Mandate.

The petitioner was a tenant running a textile shop in a building at Magadi Town, measuring 19 feet by 76 feet, referred to as Schedule-B property. He ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Disputes Reference Order; Considers Whether Long Delay and Non-Recognised Union Vitiate Reference Under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Petitioner Argues Staleness of Dispute and Lack of Application of Mind by Deputy Commissioner.

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Limited, a manufacturer of two-wheelers and three-wheelers at Waluj, Aurangabad, challenged an order of reference dated 21 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench Considers Validity of Rule Excluding Full-Time Salaried Assistant Public Prosecutors from District Judge Appointments. The case concerns interpretation of 'advocate' under Article 233(2) of the Constitution and consistency with Supreme Court precedent.

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court heard a reference arising from a writ petition filed by six Assistant Public Prosecutors employed on a full-ti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Look Out Circulars in Absence of Cognizable Offence. Court holds that LOC cannot be issued against individuals when no FIR or cognizable offence is registered, quashing LOCs issued against petitioners.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by individuals challenging Look Out Circulars (LOCs) issued against them by the police authorities. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Union of India in Army Dismissal Case Due to Procedural Irregularity. Summary Court Martial Conducted Without Following Mandatory Procedure Under Army Rules 22-24 and Section 80 of Army Act, 1950 Renders Dismissal Void.

The Union of India, Ministry of Defence, and other appellants challenged an order dated 5th September 2001 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Kar...