Search Results for "wrong rule"

4941 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4941 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

COMMERCIAL FIRST APPEAL NO. 23 OF 2025

The appellant, a partnership firm, filed a commercial suit for recovery of its claim amount after attempting pre-institution mediation. The appellant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Jayawant Tatyaba Khaire, a Taluka Agricultural Officer, for offences under Sections 7 and 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals of Tenants Against MHADA in Slum Rehabilitation Disputes — Held That Tenants in Possession Before Cut-Off Date Are Entitled to Rehabilitation Under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971.

The judgment involves multiple appeals filed by tenants against the Maharashtra Housing Area Development Authority (MHADA) concerning slum rehabilitat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation for Illegal Detention in Chapter Proceedings — Violation of D.K. Basu Guidelines. Petitioner awarded Rs. 25,000 for being detained over 24 hours without production before Magistrate in Chapter Proceeding No. 68/2005 under Section 107 of CrPC.

The petitioner, Balasaheb Sadanand Bhagat @ Bhakta, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad, seeking compensa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Labour Commissioner's Order on Subsistence Allowance Calculation Under Karnataka Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act, 1988 — Management's Appeal Allowed as Authority Exceeded Jurisdiction by Adjudicating Disputed Facts Without Proper Enquiry.

The petitioner, Recaero India Private Limited, a company engaged in manufacturing aircraft components with 82 workmen, challenged an order dated 05.11...