Search Results for "tribunal's jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "tribunal's jurisdiction"

8552 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8552 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Tribunal's Refusal to Stay Redemption Fine. Holds that Customs Tribunal Has Inherent Jurisdiction to Stay Redemption Fine Under Section 125 of Customs Act, 1962, as Section 129E Does Not Apply.

8 Dec 2017

The appellant, Mydream Properties Private Limited, imported a yacht and VSAT equipment, against which the Commissioner of Customs passed an order-in-o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Department's Appeal, Holds CESTAT Has Power to Condon Delay Under Section 129A(5) of Customs Act, 1962. The Court Remanded the Matter for Consideration of Condonation of Delay on Merits, Ruling That Appeals Under Section 129D(3) Are Deemed Appeals Under Section 129A and Thus Subject to the Same Condonation Power.

13 Aug 2010

The Commissioner of Customs (Gen), Mumbai, filed an appeal before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) against an order of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment in Commercial Appeal No. 38 of 2017: Appeal Against Single Judge’s Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award under MSMED Act. Issues of Limitation, Mis-joinder of Causes of Action, and Territorial Jurisdiction Raised in Challenge to Award for Interest on Delayed Payments.

31 Aug 2017

The appellant, M/s. Delton Electricals, a partnership firm and small scale industrial unit, filed Original Application No. 1 of 2005 before the Micro ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows State Appeal Against NGT Order on PUC Certificates — Holds That NGT Cannot Direct Fuel Bans or Impose Monetary Deposits for Compliance. The Court ruled that the NGT exceeded its jurisdiction under the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, by directing fuel supply denial and imposing a Rs. 25 crore deposit, as such powers are not conferred by the Act.

28 Aug 2020

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against an order of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) Central Zonal Bench, Bhopal, dated 21 April 2015, which dir...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Housing Board Against High Court Order Directing Arbitration Tribunal to Entertain Fresh Claim Despite Prior Arbitral Award. Principle of Issue Estoppel and Finality of Award Under Arbitration Act, 1996 Applied.

26 Oct 2021

The case involves three civil appeals by the Madhya Pradesh Housing and Infrastructure Development Board against a common judgment of the Madhya Prade...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Rejecting Condonation of Delay in Customs and Central Excise Appeals; Directs Fresh Consideration. Appellate Authorities Failed to Exclude Time Taken in Prosecuting Writ Petitions Before Filing Statutory Appeals, as Required Under Section 14(2) of Limitation Act, 1963.

24 Dec 2014

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court. The lead petition, WP N...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Partial Award on Existence of JEA. The petition challenges an arbitral tribunal's finding that an initialled but unsigned JEA was a valid contract containing an arbitration agreement under Section 7 of the Arbitration Act.

3 Nov 2025

The petition arose out of a partial arbitral award dated January 9, 2014, passed under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Petition Challenging Termination Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Labour Court at Mumbai lacks jurisdiction as cause of action arose in Silchar, Assam, and contract clause limiting jurisdiction to Bombay does not apply to industrial disputes under MRTU & PULP Act.

19 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Mr. Anil Murlidharan, was employed by M/s. Larsen and Toubro Limited as a Eutectician from 26 July 1995. He was initially posted at Va...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court held that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contractual clauses was plausible and not patently illegal.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd., entered into a contract with the respondent, Jai Laxmi Constructions Engineers An...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Not Barred Under Section 34 When Challenge is to Mortgage Validity and Bank's Actions, Not Recovery Proceedings. The court held that the bar under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act does not apply to a suit seeking declaration of title and challenging the validity of a mortgage, as such issues are not within the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

16 Jul 2021

The appellant, Smt. Nanjamma, filed a civil suit (O.S.No.3780/2017) before the XXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, seeking a dec...

29 30 31 32 33

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)