Search Results for "third party purchaser"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "third party purchaser"

1218 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1218 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Notification Dated 16.08.2008 Imposing Forest Development Tax. Validity of Notification Questioned on Grounds of Legislative Competence and Consistency with Central Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases Under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963; Constitutional Validity of Section 98A and Notification Examined. The petitioners contended that the notification dated 16.08.2008 and demand of forest development tax from holders of mining leases in forest areas were repugnant to the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and ultra vires the State's legislative competence.

3 Dec 2015

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various entities inc...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

3 Dec 2015

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company Application as Not Maintainable for Lack of Leave Under Section 446(2) of Companies Act, 1956. Applicants Sought Declaration Against Depositors Management Committee Without Prior Approval of Company Court.

22 Mar 2017

The judgment pertains to Company Application No.85 of 2014 filed by six applicants (Shri Kashinath R. Jhunjhunwala and others) against M/s Laxmichand ...

Tribunals

NCLAT Dismisses Liquidator's Appeal Against Dismissal of Contempt Petition in Insolvency Case — No Willful Disobedience of Tribunal Order Established. Liquidator's Contempt Plea Fails as Respondent's Actions Did Not Amount to Willful Disobedience of Judgment Dated 02.08.2023 Under Section 60(5) of IBC, 2016.

4 Oct 2024

The Appellant, Mr. Pankaj Dhanuka, the Liquidator of Lanco Kondapalli Power Limited, filed a contempt petition before the National Company Law Tribuna...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 37 Appeals, Upholding Arbitral Award Against Project Owner in Construction Dispute. Project Owner Bound by Arbitration Clause Though Non-Signatory, Owing to Active Participation and Common Intention Under Cox and Kings Principle.

3 Nov 2025

The Bombay High Court considered three appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arising from a construction contract dis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Impleadment of Third Party in Specific Performance Suit — Consent Party Without Independent Right or Liability Not Necessary or Proper Party Under Order I Rule 10 CPC. The court held that a third party who is merely a consenting party to an agreement for sale, without any independent right or liability, is neither a necessary nor a proper party to a suit for specific performance, and the plaintiff as dominus litis cannot be compelled to litigate against such a party.

14 Jul 2022

The petitioners, as plaintiffs in Special Civil Suit No. 16 of 2018, sought specific performance of an agreement dated 16.02.2015 for the sale of land...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Charity Commissioner's Order Allowing Intervention in Trust's Section 36 Application. Right to be Heard Under Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1951 Limited to Persons with Direct Interest in Trust Property.

20 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Shree Khambhati Modh Vanik Samaj, is a public charitable trust registered under the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950. It owns a prop...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of First Appellate Court's Decree for Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale. High Court Had Directed Refund of Earnest Money Instead of Specific Performance, Holding That Appellant Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness.

1 Jan 1970

The litigation arose from an agreement for sale dated 08.01.2010, whereby the defendants agreed to sell two items of immovable property to the appella...

29 30 31 32 33

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)