Search Results for "seizure and recovery"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "seizure and recovery"

1826 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1826 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reviews Appeal Against Conviction Under NDPS Act for Possession of Commercial Quantity of Poppy Husk; Final Disposition Not Mentioned in Extracted Text. Lower Courts Held That Section 50 NDPS Act Does Not Apply to Vehicle Searches and That Substantial Compliance with Section 42 Was Shown; House Recovery Was Excluded Due to Non-Compliance with Section 100(4) CrPC.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court of India heard a criminal appeal arising from the conviction of an appellant under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Ac...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment in Appeals Against Acquittal in IPC Murder Case. Appeals by State and Victim Challenge Acquittal of Three Accused for Murder Under Sections 302, 201, 114 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence of Motive and Recovery.

15 Nov 2022

The case involved appeals against the acquittal of three accused by the VI Additional District and Sessions Court, Tumakuru for the murder of one M.P....

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused for Murder, Acquits Others in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC sustained for accused who inflicted fatal injuries, while others acquitted for insufficient proof of common intention.

23 Oct 2013

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by convicted accused and a criminal application by the State seeking leave to appeal against acqui...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Atrocity Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Improper Investigation. Conviction under SC/ST Act and IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove caste-based insult and arson beyond reasonable doubt.

16 Jul 2021

The appellant, Aba @ Munjaba s/o Rajabhau Giri, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-2, Ambajogai, in Special Case No. 3 of 2013 for offence...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Jewellery Exports from SEZ — Held that goods manufactured in SEZ and exported are not liable to customs duty under Section 2(23) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with SEZ Act, 2005. The court ruled that the SEZ Act, 2005 is a complete code and overrides the Customs Act, and the demand of duty was contrary to the scheme of the SEZ Act.

19 Nov 2022

The petitioners, M/s. Renaissance Global Limited and M/s. Gold Star Jewellery Designs Pvt. Ltd., are companies engaged in the manufacture and export o...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Reconsiders Appellant’s Murder Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence; Handwriting Expert Opinion Under Scrutiny. Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 IPC Challenged on Grounds That Chain of Circumstances Incomplete and Expert Evidence Not Corroborated.

13 Jun 2005

The appellant, Vikas Ramdas Khairnar Patil, preferred a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court against his conviction and life imprisonment for ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Related Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 143, 147, 148, 149 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

7 Jun 2018

The judgment arises from a criminal appeal against conviction for murder and related offences. The appellants, original accused Nos.1-3, 5, and 6, wer...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Destruction of Evidence Under IPC. Conviction by Trial Court for Offences Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Challenged on Grounds of Inadequate Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive.

6 Jun 2022

The criminal appeal arose from the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the trial Court in S.C.No.58/2013 dated 21.11.2016, whereby ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Acquits Accused in Police Assault Case Due to Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Section 332 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

21 Dec 2011

The appellant, Chhalasingh s/o Kishansing Chavan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Basmathnagar, for an offence under Section 332 of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

30 Nov -0001

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

29 30 31 32 33

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)