High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Multiple Appeals Concerning Land Acquisition by KIADB — Appeals Challenge Orders Directing Fresh Awards and Rejecting Pleas of Lapsing of Acquisition Proceedings.
21 Feb 2025...
Search Results for "section 47(3)"
433 result(s) found
Found 433 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Husband and In-Laws in Dowry Case Due to Lack of Cruelty-Dowry Nexus. Allegations of Unnatural Sex, Betting, and Restrictions on Dancing Not Sufficient to Constitute Offences Under Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.
10 Jun 2025The case arose from a matrimonial dispute where the husband and his parents (petitioners) sought quashing of FIR No.58 of 2024 registered against them...
High Court
Karnataka High Court Hears Quashing Petition in SC/ST and POCSO Case. Accused Seek to Quash Charge Sheet and Cognizance Order in Offences Including Rape and Caste-Based Atrocities Under Multiple Acts.
21 Jul 2025The criminal petition was filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance ord...
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in NDPS Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Conscious Possession of Heroin. Recovery of Contraband from Bag Not Linked to Accused as Independent Witnesses Turned Hostile and Procedural Lapses in Search and Seizure Under NDPS Act, 1985.
27 Feb 2017The appeal was filed by the Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau, Chennai, against the judgment of acquittal dated 18.10.2008 passed by the ...
- 22
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Applicant in Medical Treatment Withdrawal Case — CANH Held to Be Medical Treatment and Withdrawal Permitted Under Best Interest Principle. Right to Die with Dignity under Article 21 Recognised to Include Withholding of Life-Sustaining Treatment from Patient in Permanent Vegetative State.
1 Jan 1970The matter arose from a tragic accident in 2013 when Harish Rana, then a 20-year-old engineering student, fell from the fourth floor of his accommodat...
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court Pronounces Verdict in Arbitration Petition Challenging Award That Set Aside Termination of Oil Terminal Operations Contract. Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Alleges Award is Patently Illegal as Arbitrator Disregarded Contract Terms and Misinterpreted Safety Audit Report.
19 Dec 2025The dispute arose from an Operating and Services Agreement (OSA) dated 5 May 2015 between HPCL and Aegis for management, operation and maintenance of ...
- 17
High Court
Karnataka High Court Quashes Communication Rejecting Coal Import Tender Bid as Non-Responsive for Arbitrary Reasons. Subsidiary Company Cannot be Disqualified Based on Parent Company’s Contract Termination When Tender Conditions Do Not Explicitly Bar Reliance on Parent’s Experience, Under Article 14 of the Constitution.
29 Jan 2024The petitioner, a subsidiary company engaged in coal import and supply, challenged a communication by the Karnataka Power Corporation Limited rejectin...
- 17
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder and Criminal Conspiracy in Gang-Related Killing. Conviction under Sections 302 and 120B IPC based on circumstantial evidence and motive established through prior enmity.
20 Nov 2015The case involves three appellants, Faim @ Lala Ibrahim Khan, Kamlesh @ Babla @ Bablya Shankar Malpedi, and Haresh @ Harsh Prabhakar Patil, who were c...
- 77
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in NDPS Case: Conviction for Possession of 900 gm Smack Upheld Despite Procedural Challenges. Chance recovery from vehicle under Section 43 NDPS Act does not require compliance with Section 50, and police testimony alone can sustain conviction.
29 Nov 2021The appellant, Kallu Khan, was convicted under Sections 8 and 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for possession...
- 314
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Placement of Bail Order Before Detaining Authority. The court held that the bail order was a vital document and its non-consideration vitiated the subjective satisfaction under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.
6 Nov 2012The petitioner, brother of the detinue, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the detention order dated 17th...
- 168
