Search Results for "quashed notice"

10903 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10903 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Against IGST Demand of Rs.1524 Crores on Arbitration Award Damages. Issue Pertains to Whether Damages Paid Under Deemed Decree Constitute Consideration for Taxable Service Under IGST Act, 2017.

The dispute centers on a writ petition filed by Tata Sons Private Limited (Tata) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging an intima...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Petition Challenging Stop Work Notice in Slum Redevelopment Project. Corporation's Notice Under Section 354A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Quashed for Non-Compliance with DCR 33(7) Prior Approval Requirement.

The petitioner, M/s Crescent Property Developers, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Legality of Land Acquisition for Jaipur Metro Rail Phase II, Focusing on Compliance with Section 5A Hearing. The Court Examined Whether Denial of Personal Hearing to Landowners Vitiates Acquisition under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The Supreme Court heard civil appeals by landowners challenging a Division Bench judgment of the Rajasthan High Court that reversed a Single Judge's o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Quashes Reassessment Order Under Income Tax Act Due to Time-Barred Notice. Issuance of Order Beyond Surviving Time as Directed by Supreme Court Renders Proceeding Invalid.

The Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed by the petitioner-company, Gayatri Microns Ltd., challenging the reasses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Grampanchayat Dispute. Special Meeting Convened by Tahsildar Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 Held Valid Despite Alleged Procedural Irregularities.

The petitioner, Surekha Eshwar Jadhav, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Bhatapur (PD), Taluka Mukhed, District Nanded. Respondent nos.1 to 6, who wer...