High Court of Gujarat Quashes Reassessment Order Under Income Tax Act Due to Time-Barred Notice. Issuance of Order Beyond Surviving Time as Directed by Supreme Court Renders Proceeding Invalid.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed by the petitioner-company, Gayatri Microns Ltd., challenging the reassessment proceedings initiated under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The dispute centered on the validity of an order under section 148A(d) dated 21.07.2022 and the consequent reassessment notice for Assessment Year 2017-2018. The Assessing Officer had originally issued a notice under section 148 on 29.06.2021 during the extended period provided by the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020 (TOLA). Following the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India v. Ashish Agarwal, that notice was to be treated as a show-cause notice under section 148A(b). Pursuant to the directions, the Assessing Officer supplied information to the assessee on 21.05.2022, with a due date for reply falling on 06.06.2022. The petitioner filed a reply on 01.06.2022, and the impugned order under section 148A(d) was passed on 21.07.2022. The core legal issue was whether this order was issued within the 'surviving time' as mandated by the Supreme Court in its subsequent ruling in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal. The High Court, relying on its earlier decision in Dhanraj Govindram Kella, applied the principle that a notice under section 148 of the new regime must be issued within the time limit surviving from the original notice under the old regime to 30.06.2021. For Assessment Year 2017-2018, the original notice dated 29.06.2021 left a surviving time of one day, and the due date for issuance under the new regime was computed as 08.06.2022. Since the order was passed on 21.07.2022, it was held to be beyond the surviving time and thus invalid and time-barred. The High Court extracted the relevant paragraphs from Rajeev Bansal, which stated that all notices issued beyond the surviving period are time-barred and liable to be set aside. The court accordingly quashed the order under section 148A(d) and all consequential proceedings, making the rule absolute with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Reassessment Proceedings - Validity of notice under sections 147, 148, 148A - Income-tax Act, 1961, sections 147, 148, 148A; Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020 - The High Court considered the effect of the Supreme Court decisions in Ashish Agarwal and Rajeev Bansal regarding notices issued during the extended period under TOLA. It held that the reassessment notice under section 148 of the new regime must be issued within the 'surviving time' computed from the date of the original notice under section 148 of the old regime to 30.06.2021. In the present case, the original notice was issued on 29.06.2021, giving a surviving time of 1 day, and the due date for issuance of the new notice was determined as 08.06.2022. The impugned order under section 148A(d) was passed on 21.07.2022, which was beyond this calculated date, rendering it invalid and time-barred. The High Court quashed the order under section 148A(d) and all consequent proceedings, making the rule absolute (Paras 5-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned order under section 148A(d) dated 21.07.2022 and consequent reassessment proceedings were valid in view of the Supreme Court's directions regarding computation of the surviving time limit for issuing notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned order under Section 148A(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 dated 21.07.2022 and all consequential proceedings were quashed and set aside. The rule was made absolute, with no order as to costs.

Law Points

  • reassessment notice under section 148 must be issued within surviving time under TOLA
  • notices issued beyond surviving time are time barred
  • in view of Supreme Court in Ashish Agarwal and Rajeev Bansal
  • the time limit for issuing notice under new regime is determined by the surviving time from the original notice under old regime read with TOLA
  • all notices issued beyond surviving period are invalid and liable to be set aside
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 532

R/Special Civil Application No. 23328 of 2022

2026-03-03

A.S. Supehia, Pranav Trivedi

2026:GUJHC:19871-DB

Jaimin A Gandhi for the petitioner, Dev D Patel for the respondent

Gayatri Microns Ltd.

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle (2)(1)(1), Ahmedabad

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the validity of reassessment proceedings under the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought the quashing of the order under section 148A(d) dated 21.07.2022 and the consequential reassessment proceedings as being invalid and time-barred.

Filing Reason

The petitioner contended that the notice under the new regime was issued beyond the surviving time as per the Supreme Court's directions in Ashish Agarwal and Rajeev Bansal, making it invalid.

Previous Decisions

The Assessing Officer had originally issued a notice under section 148 on 29.06.2021, which was later treated as a notice under section 148A(b) following the Supreme Court's decision in Ashish Agarwal. The petitioner then challenged the subsequent order under section 148A(d) dated 21.07.2022.

Issues

Whether the impugned order under section 148A(d) dated 21.07.2022 and consequent reassessment proceedings were valid in view of the Supreme Court's directions regarding the computation of the surviving time limit for issuing notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the notice was issued beyond the surviving time and thus invalid and time-barred. The learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Revenue verified the dates and did not controvert the factual timeline.

Ratio Decidendi

A notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 issued under the new regime pursuant to the Supreme Court's directions in Ashish Agarwal must be issued within the 'surviving time' computed from the date of the original notice under section 148 of the old regime to 30.06.2021. If issued beyond such surviving time, it is invalid and time-barred, and all consequent proceedings are liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

the limitation for issuance of notice under section 148 of the Act applying the decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in case of Ashish Agarwal (supra) as well as Rajeev Bansal (supra), would be 08.06.2022 as original notice u/s 148 [now 148A(b)] was issued on 29/06/2021 the impugned order under Section 148A(d) dated 21.07.2022 and consequent reopening proceedings would be invalid notice as the said notice is issued after 08.06.2022 The Assessing Officers were required to issue the reassessment notice under section 148 of the new regime within the time limit surviving under the Income-tax Act read with the Taxation and other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020. All notices issued beyond the surviving period are time barred and liable to be set aside.

Procedural History

For Assessment Year 2017-2018, the Assessing Officer issued a notice under section 148 on 29.06.2021 during the extended period under TOLA. Following the Supreme Court's decision in Ashish Agarwal, the notice was treated as a show-cause notice under section 148A(b). On 21.05.2022, the Assessing Officer provided information to the assessee. The assessee filed a reply on 01.06.2022. The impugned order under section 148A(d) was passed on 21.07.2022. The petitioner then filed Special Civil Application No. 23328 of 2022 challenging the order. On 03.03.2026, the High Court allowed the petition and quashed the order and proceedings.

Acts & Sections

  • Income-tax Act, 1961: 147, 148, 148A, 148A(b), 148A(d)
  • Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020: 3(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals From Accused Against Rejection of Discharge Applications in Organised Crime Case. Court Finds Prima Facie Evidence of Involvement in Continuing Unlawful Activity Under Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 19...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition, Sets Aside Adjudication Orders for Breach of Natural Justice. Non-Compliance with Tribunal's Remand Directions on Disclosure of Test Reports Amounts to Denial of Fair Hearing Under Article 226 of the Constituti...