Search Results for "muddemal"

897 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 897 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Destruction of Evidence in Circumstantial Evidence Case. Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Incriminating Articles Sufficient to Convict Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC.

The appellant, Ashish Burange, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kopargaon, for the murder of Pushpa Pande, a 59-year-old spinster and r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband and Wife for Murder of Brother-in-Law Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of circumstances including last seen, motive, and recovery of weapon held sufficient to sustain conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC.

The case involves two appeals filed by Khomu Kasar Bahadur Raul (appellant no.1) and Yeshori Keshav Bahadur Raul (appellant no.2), husband and wife, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ananta Mahadeo Motghare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for the murder of Nanaji Raghoji Dhok under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Alters Conviction from Murder to Culpable Homicide in Sudden Quarrel Stabbing Case. Single Knife Blow During Intervention Without Premeditation Falls Under Section 304-II IPC, Not Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Rushi Domaji Uike, was convicted by the 3rd Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No.13/2003 for the offence punis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish the common object and individual overt acts beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a judgment of the Sessions Court convicting Shankar Sonu More and Ravindra Kashinath More (origina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves a criminal appeal against conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for murder. The appellant, Feroz Khan s/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Related Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 143, 147, 148, 149 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The judgment arises from a criminal appeal against conviction for murder and related offences. The appellants, original accused Nos.1-3, 5, and 6, wer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act — Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Age Proved by School Records. The court held that minor contradictions do not discredit the victim's evidence and the presumption under Section 29 POCSO Act applies.

The appellant, Akash s/o Devanand Tempe, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special Criminal (POCSO) Case No. 198/2016 for the offence pun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 395 and 397 IPC set aside as sole identification by injured witness was not credible and recovery of stolen property was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an incident of dacoity that occurred on 3 November 2008 when Madhukar Palankar, the father of the informant Shailesh Palankar, wa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Adjudicates Criminal Appeal Against Conviction for Ganja Possession Under Section 20(b) of the NDPS Act. Appeal Challenges the Trial Court's Judgment Sentencing the Accused to Three Years Rigorous Imprisonment and Fine.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Special Judge (NDPS Court), Nagpur, in NDPS Special Case No. 24 of 2017, whereby the appellant was convicted f...