Search Results for "mandatory examination"

2949 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2949 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Trial Court Judgment for Lack of Reasons in Declaration and Injunction Suit — Remands for Fresh Disposal. Court finds that the Trial Court failed to discuss evidence or assign reasons on issues framed, rendering the judgment unsustainable under Order 20 Rule 4(2) CPC.

The appellant, who was the defendant in the original suit, challenged the judgment and decree dated 23 June 2014 passed by the XLIII Additional City C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition to Quash FIR Against School Authorities Accused Under POCSO Act. Court Holds that Statutory Duty to Report Child Sexual Abuse Overrides Institutional Silence and Upholds Investigation for Failure to Report Under Section 21.

The judgment arises from a criminal petition filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the FIR registe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Decides Challenge to Arbitral Award in Reclamation Work Contract Dispute. Petition Filed Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Seeking to Set Aside Award for Alleged Procedural Irregularities.

The petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by the Board of Trustees of Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Arbitration Reference and Anti-Suit Injunction in Wind Turbine Technology Licensing Dispute. The Core Issue Revolves Around Whether an Unincorporated IPLA Constitutes a Binding Arbitration Agreement Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The dispute arose from a joint venture between Enercon (India) Ltd. and its directors (Petitioners) and Enercon GmbH and Wobben Properties GmbH (Respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Prevention of Food Adulteration Act Case Due to Non-Service of Public Analyst Report. Mandatory service requirement under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 was not met as report was not served on accused, vitiating prosecution and conviction.

The dispute arose from a prosecution under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, where the appellant was convicted for selling adulterated ch...