Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench Hears Writ Petition Filed by 88 Individuals. Petition Challenges Unspecified Action/Omission by Unknown Respondents.
21 May 2026Judgment Analysis - Auto Generated...
Search Results for "leave wages"
1282 result(s) found
Found 1282 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Hears Writ Petition Filed by 88 Petitioners. Writ Petition No. 391 of 2023 Seeks Direction for Service Conditions and Appointment.
23 May 2026Judgment Analysis - Auto Generated...
- 101
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions by Employer in Unfair Labour Practice Cases Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Labour Court at Mumbai Held to Have No Jurisdiction Over Employees Working Outside Mumbai Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.
5 Jun 2023The petitioners, M/s. Abbott Healthcare Private Limited and others, filed three writ petitions challenging identical orders passed by the Industrial C...
- 66
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Trade Union's Writ Petition Seeking Prohibition of Contract Labour and Regularization of Workers at Temple. The Court held that disputed questions of fact regarding employer-employee relationship cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction and that the appropriate remedy lies under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
8 Aug 2023The petitioner, Rashtriya Shramik Aghadi, a registered trade union, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a writ of prohibition t...
- 16
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses State Government's Challenge to Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency Benefits to Horticultural Workers under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. The court upheld the Industrial Court's finding that employees engaged in preparing fruit plants, tree plants, vegetable plants, and plantation activity for over 240 days are entitled to permanency benefits.
4 Nov 2023The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by the State Government of Maharashtra challenging the order of the Industrial Court, Kolhapur, date...
- 74
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Reinstatement with Full Back Wages in MSRTC Employee Termination Case — Termination Held Illegal for Violation of Natural Justice and Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court held that once termination is found illegal, reinstatement with full back wages is the normal rule, and the employer failed to justify denial of back wages.
13 May 2022The petitioner, Shankar M. Gowekar, a workman employed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), was terminated from service on 16/...
- 55
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Lecturers' Plea for Regularization in Unaided Engineering College — UGC Pay Scales Not Mandatory for Private Unaided Institutions. Petitioners failed to establish employer-employee relationship with State or that college receives government aid, and regularization cannot be claimed as a matter of right without sanctioned posts.
20 Sep 2022The petitioners, lecturers in various departments at Shri Guru Govind Singhji Institution of Engineering and Technology, Nanded, filed writ petitions ...
- 78
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Workmen's Right to Claim Both Gratuity and Retrenchment Compensation; Section 25F(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, interpreted to allow dual benefits.
16 Oct 1959The dispute originated from an industrial reference between the Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd. and its workmen concerning a claim for gratuity. The employe...
- 55
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Bonus Calculation Dispute Involving Subsidiary Company. Service Fee Payment Under Technical Aid Agreement Held to Be Legitimate Expenditure, and Deduction of Bonus as Prior Charge Before Depreciation and Tax Ruled Improper Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
6 May 1959The dispute arose out of a claim for bonus by the workmen of Crompton Parkinson (Works) Private Ltd., Bombay, which was initially a wholly-owned subsi...
- 54
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court Judgment Setting Aside Appellate Authority Order Under Madhya Pradesh Shops & Establishments Act, 1958. The Court affirmed that clubs not being residential clubs are exempt from the Act under Section 3(j), rendering the Appellate Authority's reinstatement order invalid.
26 Oct 2021The dispute arose from the termination of services of the appellants, who were employees at a club run by the respondents. The appellants filed a comp...
- 349
