Search Results for "landlord‑tenant relationship"

546 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 546 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Eviction Suit in Bona Fide Requirement Dispute. Appellate Court's Reversal Upheld as Landlord Failed to Prove Reasonable and Bona Fide Need for Suit Premises Under Section 13(1)(g) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The petitioner, Shiv Kumar I. Agarwal, through his constituted authority, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows State Appeal in Rent Dispute, Holds Contractual Obligations Not Enforceable Under Article 226. Dispute Over Enhanced Rent Between Landlord and Government Office Tenant Requires Adjudication of Disputed Facts, Not Suitable for Writ Proceedings.

The dispute arose from a landlord-tenant relationship where the respondent, D.R. Naidu (power agent of the owner), had rented premises to the Office o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Declares Section 13(2) of Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011 Ultra Vires for Lack of Legislative Competence. State Legislature Cannot Confer Direct Appellate Jurisdiction on Supreme Court; Provision Invalid.

The case arose from an appeal filed under Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, against an eviction order passed by the Rent Contr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Tribunal Order Granting Tenancy Rights in Land Reforms Case — Tribunal Failed to Consider Evidence and Conduct Proper Inquiry Under Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

The petitioner, K.T. Venkatappa (since deceased, represented by his legal representatives), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Land Tribunal Order Granting Tenancy Rights to Respondents 3 and 4 Under Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 — Petitioner Failed to Prove Ownership or Adverse Possession.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by K.T. Venkatappa (since deceased, represented by his legal representatives) challenging the order dated 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Possession Suit, Confirms Concurrent Findings on Limitation and Valuation. Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963 applies to suit for possession based on title, and valuation under Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959 is not a jurisdictional issue.

The appellant, original defendant, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the concurrent judgments ...