Search Results for "land acquisition lapse"

666 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 666 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Landowner's Petition in Land Acquisition Case Due to Delay in Final Notification Under Section 11(7) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Preliminary Notification Deemed Rescinded as Final Notification Not Issued Within Statutory Period.

The petitioner, Sri K. Ganganna, owned lands that were acquired by the respondents for the Indian Railways. A preliminary notification under Section 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Civil Courts. Petitioners failed to establish possession or title over suit lands; mutation entries held not conferring title under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by various petitioners challenging mutation entries made in the revenue records in favor of the origin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BDA Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Acquisition Proceedings Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation for Land at Thippasandra Village.

The Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) appealed against an order of a learned Single Judge which held that the acquisition proceedings in respect o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Declares Land Acquisition Proceedings Lapsed for Non-Passage of Award Under BDA Act. Petitioner's Suit for Injunction Decreed in 2010, Acquisition Deemed Lapsed Due to Failure to Pass Award Within Reasonable Time.

The petitioner, M.P. Gundappa, owned 2 acres of land in Sy.No.124/2 at Nagadevanahalli, Kengeri Hobli, Bengaluru South Taluk. The land was notified fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to BDA Scheme Non-Lapse and Government's Withdrawal Notification. Scheme Under BDA Act Does Not Lapse Automatically Under Section 27; Government's Power to Withdraw from Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Upheld.

The petitioner, Sri H. Krishna Reddy, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the 'By...