Search Results for "interlocutory order challenge"

1132 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1132 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition as Not Maintainable Against Interim Maintenance Order Under Section 125(2) Cr.P.C. — Interim Order Under Section 125(2) Cr.P.C. Is Interlocutory and Not Subject to Revision Under Section 19(4) of Family Court Act.

The revision petition was filed by the wife and minor child against an order dated 24.07.2020 passed by the IV Additional Principal Family Judge, Mysu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals in Seniority Dispute with Directions for Expedited Hearing. Court Maintains Interim Stay and Directs High Court to Dispose of Pending Writ Petition Challenging Seniority Fixation Between Special Recruitment and General Quota Assistant Section Officers.

The dispute originated from a challenge to the fixation of inter se seniority between two batches of directly recruited Assistant Section Officers in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Municipal Corporation in Demolition Notice Case. Court holds that demolition notices under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 require prior show-cause notice and opportunity of hearing, upholding trial court's order setting aside notices.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (appellant) filed an appeal against an order of the City Civil Court, Mumbai, which set aside demolition n...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Restitution to Judgment Debtor Under Section 144 CPC When Decree Varied and Decree Holder Purchased Property in Auction. Auction Sale Set Aside Due to Variation of Decree and Lack of Bona Fide Purchaser Status.

The appeal arose from a restitution application under Section 144 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC). The original plaintiff (decree holder) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Division Bench Order Allowing Biosimilar Launch Without Biosimilarity Claim — Remands to High Court for Fresh Consideration of Interim Relief in Drug Regulatory Dispute

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal against an interim order of the Delhi High Court Division Bench dated 18.09.2019. The dispute involved M/s ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 27(3) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Summary Trial for Non-Compliance Upheld. Section 27(3) is a complete code and does not violate Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Shri A. G. Sawant, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...