Search Results for "builders/developers"

663 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 663 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Building Construction Permissions as Barred by Res Judicata and Laches. The Court held that the petitioners had previously litigated the same issues and obtained no relief, and the PIL was filed after substantial construction had already been completed.

The Altamount Road Area Citizens Committee and another petitioner filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Earth from Metro Project. Excavated earth from underground metro construction not 'minor mineral' under Notification dated 3 February 2000; no royalty payable.

The petitioner, Tata Projects Limited, a member of a consortium executing the Mumbai Metro Underground Project, filed a writ petition under Article 22...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Determines Compensation in Land Acquisition References for MSRTC Bus Depot at Dahisar, Borivali. Comparable Land Sale Instances Analyzed to Fix Market Value Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

This matter involved a group of land acquisition references under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, filed by land owners whose properties ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice and Order in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Full and True Disclosure Finding and Non-Disposal of Objections. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid as No Failure to Disclose Material Facts Alleged Under Section 147 First Proviso of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Crystal Pride Developers, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development, filed its original return of income for Assessment Ye...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Premium Paid for FSI Exclusion in Town Planning Case — No Development Commenced, No Benefit Availed. The court held that retention of premium without providing any benefit amounts to unjust enrichment under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioners, Shri Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Smt. Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 15 February 2020...