Search Results for "arbitrary levy"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "arbitrary levy"

581 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 581 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Tender for Water Supply and Sewerage System in MIHAN Area. The dispute centered on whether loading of service tax on the lowest bid for evaluation purposes was arbitrary and in violation of pre-bid clarifications.

27 Apr 2010

Background: The dispute arose from a tender floated by Maharashtra Airport Development Company Limited (MADC) for the operation and comprehensive main...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Statutory Bar Permits Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants Paid Premium for Extra FSI but Abandoned Project; Court Held Retention of Premium Without Benefit Amounts to Unjust Enrichment.

1 Jan 2026

The appellants, Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, owned agricultural land in Survey No. 103/2/2 of Alandi Taluka, Pune District...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Express Refund Provision Does Not Bar Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants paid ₹30,46,290/- as premium for additional FSI but abandoned construction; Court held that retention of premium without utilization is unjust enrichment and directed refund with interest.

1 Jan 2026

The appellants, Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, owned agricultural land in Survey No. 103/2/2 of Alandi Taluka, Pune District...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Lessor in Rent Control Exclusion Case. Company That Lost Rent Control Protection Due to High Paid-Up Share Capital Cannot Regain It by Subsequent Reduction.

4 Oct 2024

The case involves a dispute between M/s. Depe Global Shipping Agencies Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff/Lessor) and M/s. Mather and Platt (India) Ltd. (Defendant/...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging RBI Circular Excluding Primary Cooperative Credit Societies from Deposit Insurance Coverage. Circular dated 22.02.2008 Held Valid as It Merely Clarifies Existing Definition Under Section 2(g) of DICGC Act, 1961.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by cooperative credit societies challenging a circular dated 22.02.2008 issued by the Reserve Bank of I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Press Release on GST Classification of Hand Sanitisers as Disinfectants — Executive Cannot Pre-empt Quasi-Judicial Adjudication. Press Release dated 15.07.2020 directing classification of alcohol-based hand sanitisers as 'disinfectants' under GST held ultra vires and manifestly arbitrary for encroaching upon quasi-judicial functions.

11 Nov 2024

The petitioner, M/s Schulke India Pvt. Ltd., is engaged in trading of hand rubs/sanitisers and antiseptics, which it claims are used as pharmaceutical...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Full Refund for Flights Cancelled During COVID-19 Lockdown — Office Memorandum Discriminating Between Pre-Lockdown and Lockdown Bookings Held Invalid. Airlines Must Refund Full Fare Without Cancellation Charges for All Cancelled Flights, and Credit Shell Cannot Be Imposed Unilaterally.

1 Oct 2020

The judgment arises from a batch of writ petitions filed in the Supreme Court of India challenging the refusal of airlines to refund the full amount f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications Under Act of 2013 for Rural Water Storage Tank — Multiplier of Two Not Applicable. Court holds that Section 26 read with First Schedule of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 does not mandate multiplier of two for rural land acquisition as the land is not in an urban area.

9 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Panjabrao Borade, filed a writ petition challenging notifications dated 19.3.2014 and 13.8.2014 issued by the Deputy Secretary to the ...

High Court

KAHC010068412019_1

16 Aug 2019

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Intra-Court Appeals Against Order Upholding Blocking of Electronic Credit Ledgers Under Rule 86A of CGST Rules; Considers Requirement of Pre-Decisional Hearing and Bonafide Purchaser Protection.

2 Apr 2024

The appeals arose from a common order dated 27.07.2023 passed by a Single Judge in a batch of writ petitions, rejecting the contentions of the appella...

29 30 31 32 33

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)