COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION(L) NO. 6451 OF 2020
16 Mar 2022The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Commercial Division, pronounced judgment on 16 March 2022 in a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitrat...
Search Results for "arbitral award execution"
925 result(s) found
Found 925 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Challenging Awards Passed in Hire Purchase Dispute. The Court Examines Objections Relating to Stamp Duty, Admissibility of Documents, and Jurisdiction of the Arbitrator.
24 Aug 2016The dispute stemmed from a Hire Purchase Agreement dated 24 April 1995 between the petitioners and the respondent for eight Honda Accord cars, accompa...
- 28
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Share Purchase Agreement Dispute. Court upholds award of damages for breach of contract, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
3 Nov 2025The petitioner, Sonoma Management Partners Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an ...
- 52
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Mortgage Enforcement Dispute. Claim for money recovery based on loan agreement is arbitrable even if mortgage enforcement is involved; withdrawal of mortgage relief does not affect jurisdiction under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
4 Aug 2015The petitioners, Harikishan Shankarji Gogikar and Millenium Technorbit Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation ...
- 157
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Third-Party Claim in Execution Proceedings -- Appellant Fails to Remove Property Attachment for Arbitral Award Recovery -- Mother of Company Director Cannot Defeat Creditor's Rights as Post-Award Purchaser
12 Feb 2026The Supreme Court upheld the attachment of property in execution of an arbitral award, rejecting the third-party claim by Appellant who had purchased ...
- 1153
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Revision Petition Challenging Return of Section 34 Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction — Holds That Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Contract and Prior Section 9 Filing at Salem Confer Jurisdiction on Salem Courts Under Section 42 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
21 Apr 2026The revision petitioner, Waterbury Farrel, a division of Magnum Integrated Technologies Inc., Canada, filed Arb.O.P.No.103 of 2019 before the Principa...
- 71
High Court
High Court Allows Appeal in Commercial Arbitration Case, Restoring Arbitral Award on Price Adjustment Claim. The Court held that the Commercial Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and interpreting contract clauses under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the arbitral award was based on material evidence and not patently illegal.
2 Mar 2026The dispute arose from a contract dated 09.07.2018 between the appellant, a contractor, and the respondent, the Deputy Commissioner of Dharwad Distric...
- 296
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitrator's Interim Order in Copyright License Dispute — Balance of Convenience and Irreparable Loss Considered. The court upheld the arbitrator's order restraining the petitioner from exploiting films and directing delivery of materials, finding no perversity or jurisdictional error under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
30 Jan 2013The petitioner, Moser Baer Entertainment Limited, filed a petition under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a...
- 174
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses ONGC's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Vessel Maintenance Contract Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be in Conflict with Public Policy or Patent Illegality. The court upheld the arbitral tribunal's interpretation that the respondent was not liable for pre-existing HOTO defects, as the contract did not impose such liability.
18 Oct 2010The petitioner, Oil & Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. (ONGC), challenged an arbitral award dated 2nd April, 2008 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conci...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Addresses Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator; Validity of 20% Claim Cap Clause Under Scrutiny. The Court Examines Whether a Contractual Condition Limiting Arbitration to Claims Not Exceeding 20% of Contract Value Is Arbitrary and Discriminatory.
28 Jan 2026The dispute arose from a contract dated 7 May 2018 between a contractor and the Central Railways for the preparation of design and structural drawings...
- 25
