Search Results for "Security Interest Enforcement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Security Interest Enforcement"

1406 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1406 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

10 Nov 2016

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

10 Nov 2016

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Decides Surviving Issue on Interpretation of Government Notification in Land Reservation Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Lessee Entitled to Non-Cash Compensation Under 2004 Notification for Release of Reserved Land for Development.

16 Aug 2018

The writ petition was filed by Mafatlal Industries Limited and its officer seeking directions to enforce a Government Notification dated 10-02-2004 th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Employee with Disability in Service Denial Case — Failure to Provide Reasonable Accommodation Violates Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. The court held that denial of appointment based on disability without considering reasonable accommodation is illegal and directed reconsideration.

17 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Smt. Jyoti Jayesh Tayade, a person with 40% locomotor disability, applied for the post of Security Guard with the Municipal Corporatio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Challenging Estate Officer’s Jurisdiction Under PP Act Against SARFAESI Possession. Asset Reconstruction Company Asserts SARFAESI Act Overrides PP Act, Requiring Landlord to Approach Debt Recovery Tribunal.

24 Aug 2016

The writ petitioner, an Asset Reconstruction Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and registered under the SARFAESI Act, challenged the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Applicant in PMLA Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Money Laundering. The court held that mere association with a shell entity without direct evidence of laundering proceeds of crime does not constitute an offence under Section 3 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.

5 Dec 2025

The applicant, Khilji Mohsinahmed Mustakali, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) read wi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Asset Reconstruction Company Against District Magistrate's Order Under SARFAESI Act — District Magistrate's Order Quashed for Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that the District Magistrate cannot adjudicate upon the validity of assignment of debt under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, and must hear the secured creditor before passing any adverse order.

20 Aug 2022

The petitioners, Phoenix ARC Private Limited (an Asset Reconstruction Company registered under the SARFAESI Act) and its authorized representative, fi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Writ Petition, Directs Execution of Section 14 SARFAESI Order Despite Pending Civil Suit. Executive Magistrate Cannot Refuse Possession on Ground of Civil Suit; Role Under Section 14 is Ministerial.

30 Aug 2023

The Petitioner, Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, a banking company, had sanctioned a housing loan to Dipak Digambar Naik and Aruna Naik (co-borrowers) in ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Unsuccessful Party's Section 9 Petition in Arbitration Dispute — Maintainability Upheld After Supreme Court's Home Care Retail Marts Judgment. The court held that a losing party can seek interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, overruling the earlier Division Bench decision in Dirk India.

6 May 2026

The judgment arises from a Commercial Arbitration Petition filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) against Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Interim Order in SARFAESI Act Case as Writ Petition Against Private Asset Reconstruction Company Not Maintainable. The Court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India does not lie against a private ARC, and the proper remedy is an appeal under Section 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002.

12 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from writ petitions filed by borrowers, Vishwa Bharati Vidya Mandir and St. Ann's Education Society, against Phoenix ARC Private Lim...

29 30 31 32 33

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)