KAHC010822332025_1
8 Jul 2026The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka heard two intra-court writ appeals filed by M/s MP24 Construction Company, the lead member of a cons...
Search Results for "Section 124 stay"
398 result(s) found
Found 398 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee as Nominee on Enquiry Committee Under MEPS Rules — Purposive Interpretation of Beneficial Legislation. The Court held that Rule 36(2)(b)(ii) of the MEPS Rules permits nomination of a retired/former employee to the Enquiry Committee, as the definition of 'employee' does not restrict to serving employees only.
7 Mar 2025The petitioner, Mangalsingh Amarsingh Rathod, was the Head Master of Mahatma Phule High School, Nimgaon, and was placed under suspension. A disciplina...
- 690
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 143, 147, 148, 149 IPC set aside as evidence of sole eyewitness was inconsistent and not supported by medical or other evidence.
16 Jul 2020The case arises from a common judgment of the Sessions Court convicting multiple accused for offences including murder, attempt to murder, and rioting...
- 38
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Star Zing Marks Protected. Use of identical marks 'White Chinese Pepper Masala' and 'Black Chinese Pepper Masala' by Defendant restrained as deceptively similar to Plaintiff's registered trademarks.
8 Jan 2020The Plaintiff, Sky Enterprise Private Ltd., filed a commercial IP suit alleging infringement of its registered trademarks and passing off by the Defen...
- 70
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Rajasthan Housing Board's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over LIG Tenement Allotment — Complaint Barred by Limitation and Delay. The Court held that the NCDRC erred in restoring the District Forum's order directing allotment at 1992 rates, as the respondent's own letters showed financial inability to pay and the complaint was filed after gross delay under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
22 Jul 2019The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Rajasthan Housing Board against the judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ...
- 140
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Seniority List in Zilla Parishad Service — Seniority Determined by Date of Continuous Appointment, Not Date of Initial Application
16 Aug 2016The judgment concerns multiple writ petitions filed by employees of Amravati Zilla Parishad challenging the seniority list prepared by the Parishad. T...
- 144
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Domestic Bidder Challenging Contract Award to Foreign Company. Price Preference Claim Rejected for Non-Compliance with Bid Conditions.
19 Oct 2011The Petitioner, Punj Lloyd Ltd., a domestic company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the award of a contract b...
- 74
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court Dismissal of Judgment Debtor's Application to Set Aside Receiver's Sale Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC. Order 21 Rule 89 Held Not Applicable to Receiver Appointed Under Section 51 CPC as Sale Not Conducted Under Order 21.
10 Nov 1959In execution of a money decree, the judgment debtor defaulted on payment of agreed instalments. The executing court, invoking Section 51 of the Code o...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Authority's Refusal to Register Proposed Cooperative Housing Societies as Developers under DCR 33(5). The court held that a proposed society cannot claim developer status without registration and approved scheme, and the SRA's refusal is not subject to writ jurisdiction.
30 Nov -0001The petitioners, Adarsh Estate Sahakari Griha Nirman Sanstha Maryadit (Proposed) and Saidham Sahakari Griha Nirman Sanstha Maryadit (Proposed), filed ...
- 181
Tribunals
NCLAT Chennai Dismisses Appeal Against NCLT Interim Order in Company Law Dispute — Upholds Status Quo and Appointment of Advocate Commissioner. The Tribunal held that the NCLT has the power to pass interim orders under Section 242(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 to prevent oppression and mismanagement pending final disposal.
30 Nov -0001The case involves a dispute between the appellants, Mr. Venkata Shiva Prasad Devulapalli and Mr. M. Sai Sudhakar, and the respondents, including M. Ch...
- 146
