Search Results for "Maharashtra Amendment Act 1977"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Amendment Act 1977"

754 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 754 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 28-A Application for Enhanced Compensation Based on High Court's Appellate Award Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Land owners covered by same notification can seek parity under Section 28-A even if reference court refused enhancement.

13 Jul 2023

The petitioners, legal heirs of original land owners Shankarrao Pandoji Shendge and Bhagwan Pandoji Shendge, owned agricultural land in Mouza Ansing, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Tribunal Order of Reinstatement with Back Wages for Teacher. Teacher's Appointment as Shikshan Sevak was Invalid as it Exceeded Permissible Limit Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.

4 Aug 2016

The case involves two writ petitions arising from a dispute between a teacher, Prashant Kamlakar Narkhade, and the management of K.N. Bhise Arts & Com...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Student's Petition Challenging Cancellation of Admission in Architecture Course — Regulation 4 of Minimum Standards of Architecture Education Regulations, 1983 Held Ultra Vires Section 45 of Architects Act, 1972. The court quashed the cancellation order and directed the college to allow the petitioner to continue her studies, applying the principle of legitimate expectation.

11 Jun 2012

The petitioner, a minor represented by her father, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 10...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Goa Rent Control Act. Tenant's Irregular Rent Payment and Subletting Justify Eviction Under Sections 22(a) and 22(b)(i) and (ii) of the Goa, Daman and Diu Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1968.

1 Feb 2018

The petitioners, legal representatives of the deceased tenant Gurudas Narayan Salgaonkar, challenged an order dated 03/01/2014 passed by the Appellate...

High Court

Bombay High Court Issues Rule in Writ Petition Challenging Orders Restricting Redevelopment of Cooperative Society under PWR-219 Scheme. Court frames issues regarding requirement of prior permission from Social Welfare Department for redevelopment using additional FSI/TDR.

8 Dec 2016

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a co-operative housing society challenging orders dated 8 June 2016 and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Petition Against Dismissal of Application to Set Aside Decree in Eviction Suit. Decree Passed Not Ex-Parte but Under Order XVII Rule 2 CPC, as Defendants Had Appeared Earlier and Failed to Appear at Subsequent Hearings Without Sufficient Cause.

17 Nov 2025

The dispute arose from an eviction suit filed by Kshtriya Dnyati Sabha, a registered public trust under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, against the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appellants in Reservation Eligibility Dispute Under Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000. Appellants, originally from unified Bihar and residing in Jharkhand post-reorganisation, are entitled to Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe/Other Backward Classes reservation benefits in Jharkhand as ordinary residents, not migrants, under Articles 341(1) and 342(1) of the Constitution and Sections 23, 24, 73, 74 of Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000.

19 Aug 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions challenging a High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 24th February...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Reforms Tribunal Order in Land Grant Case — Petitioners' Father Was Granted Land Under Rule 43(5) of Karnataka Land Grant Rules, 1969, and the Land Was Not Granted Under the Land Reforms Act. The Assistant Commissioner and Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to initiate proceedings under Sections 79A and 79B of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

7 Jan 2020

The petitioners, legal representatives of late D. Ramanatha Reddy, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeki...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines PIL for Heritage Conservation — Government's Omission of Buildings from Heritage List Without Consultation and Reasons Under Section 31 of MRTP Act Challenged. Petitioner Society Asserts That Statutory Procedure Was Not Followed and Heritage Conservation Committee's Recommendations Were Ignored.

5 May 2006

The Vidarbha Heritage Society, a registered society formed in 1997, filed a public interest litigation before the Bombay High Court at Nagpur seeking ...

High Court

High Court Rules on Unlawful Subletting: Transfer of Tenancy Disguised as Business Sale Invalid. Court highlights the misuse of tenancy rights and emphasizes protection of landlords under Bombay Rent Act.

7 Oct 2024

The Bombay High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, legal heirs, in a long-standing eviction dispute regarding unlawful subletting of commercial p...

29 30 31 32 33

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)