Search Results for "Building plan sanction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Building plan sanction"

540 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 540 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Industrial Plot Lease Forfeiture Case, Upholding UPSIDA's Cancellation Order. The forfeiture was justified due to breach of construction timelines under the lease agreement, and the High Court's refusal to interfere under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was correct as the dispute was contractual in nature.

6 Apr 2026

The appeal arose from a dispute over the forfeiture of an industrial plot lease by the Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Authority (UPSIDA). ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Single Judge's Order Directing Consideration of Layout Plan Approval Despite Lapsed Scheme. Scheme Notification Under Sections 17(1) and 17(3) of Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987 Lapses After 5 Years Without Section 19 Declaration.

2 Dec 2024

The State of Karnataka and the Deputy Commissioner of Vijayapura filed a writ appeal against the order of a learned Single Judge in W.P.No.201785/2023...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compromise Between Plaintiffs and Defendant Nos.8-11 in Property Suit — Consent Terms Accepted Despite Objections from Other Defendants. Partial Settlement Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC Does Not Affect Rights of Non-Settling Defendants Who May Continue to Contest the Suit.

22 Feb 2024

The suit was filed by 35 plaintiffs seeking a declaration that they are purchasers of certain property. The matter was listed for settlement as the pl...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demolition Notice Against Petitioner in BBMP Act Case — Notice Issued Without Proper Hearing and Opportunity Violates Principles of Natural Justice. The court held that Sections 238 and 239 of the BBMP Act require prior notice and hearing before demolition, and any action without such compliance is invalid.

23 Nov 2023

The petitioner, Avenue Supermarts Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Demolition and Reconstruction of Cinema Structure Subject to Height Restrictions Under Aircraft Act and Navy Act. Prior Permission from Ministry of Defence Required for Reconstruction to Ensure Compliance with Height Restrictions Near Naval Air Station.

11 Oct 2023

The Petitioner, Sameer Baijanath Joshi, is the owner of land admeasuring 3,627.90 sq. metres bearing Plot No.9-A, CTS No. 37 and 38A at Village Juhu, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Section 51 Notice in MRTP Act Case — Development Rights Not Extinguished by Lapse of Permission. Held that a notice under Section 51 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 cannot be issued for alleged breach of conditions when the development permission had already lapsed and the petitioner had acquired vested rights under a development agreement.

6 Oct 2022

The petitioner, Galore Developers Private Limited, entered into an agreement on 23 March 2010 with the Solapur Municipal Corporation (respondent nos.1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Appeal Under Section 47 of MRTP Act — Appellate Authority Must Consider Condonation of Delay and Stay on Merits. Flat Owner Has Locus to Challenge Modification of Sanctioned Plan Affecting Common Areas Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

16 Apr 2019

The petitioner, a flat owner in a building constructed by respondent No.6 on land owned by respondent No.7, filed a civil suit (R.C.S. No.517/2011) al...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction Against Cooperative Housing Society and Members — No Agreement of Sale Established, Suit Barred by Limitation. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove any valid agreement for sale of flats, and the suit was time-barred under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

10 Nov 2014

The plaintiff, Vardhaman Developers Limited, filed a suit for specific performance of an alleged oral agreement for sale of flats in a cooperative hou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Height Restriction on Multi-Storied Parking Lots Under DCR 33(24). State Government's Power to Modify Development Control Regulations Under Section 37 of MRTP Act, 1966 Upheld — No Vested Right in Unamended Regulation.

19 Nov 2012

The petitioners, claiming ownership of a plot in Tardeo, Mumbai, challenged a decision of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai contained in a l...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Impleadment Application in Suit Challenging MHADA Notice. The court held that the petitioner, a company, was not a necessary or proper party to the suit between tenants and MHADA and had no right to be impleaded.

6 Jul 2012

The petitioner, Orbit Corporate Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 9-2-2012 pass...

29 30 31 32 33

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)