Search Results for "Appellate Side Rules"

2525 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2525 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 6608 OF 2016

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Land Encroachment Suit — Remands for Fresh Consideration of Measurement Evidence. Court holds that the lower appellate court failed to consider the TILR's map and report, which constituted a substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC.

The present second appeal arises from a suit for possession of encroached land. The appellants, original plaintiffs, are members of a joint family own...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Upholds First Appellate Court's Declaration of Ownership Based on Adverse Possession and Valid Title. Concurrent findings of fact not interfered with under Section 100 CPC as no substantial question of law arose.

The case involves a Regular Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the appellant (defendant in the original su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Clerks' Petition for Old Pension Scheme: Recruitment Process Commenced Before Cut-off Date Entities Employees to Old Pension. Government Resolution of 2005 Not Applicable to Employees Recruited Before 2008 Notification.

The petitioners, 56 Clerks working on the establishment of the Bombay High Court, Appellate Side, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Aurangabad Bench Has Jurisdiction Over Parole Rejection Order Passed at Nashik Central Prison — Reference Answered in Favor of Respondent Prisoner. Territorial Jurisdiction Determined by Place of Confinement and Communication of Order, Not Solely by Location of Prison Authority.

The case arose from a reference made by a division bench of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad regarding its territorial jurisdiction to entertain a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy. Guarantors and Corporate Debtor Directed to Approach Debt Recovery Tribunal Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The petitioners, Kishan Chhelaram Manik and Manik Engineering Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the ...