Bombay High Court Allows Clerks' Petition for Old Pension Scheme: Recruitment Process Commenced Before Cut-off Date Entities Employees to Old Pension. Government Resolution of 2005 Not Applicable to Employees Recruited Before 2008 Notification.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 158
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, 56 Clerks working on the establishment of the Bombay High Court, Appellate Side, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that they are governed by the Old Pension Scheme in vogue prior to 01.11.2005 and the General Provident Fund Scheme, and that the Defined Contributory Pension Scheme (DCPS)/National Pension Scheme (NPS) introduced vide Government Resolution (G.R.) dated 31.10.2005 should not be applied to them. They also sought a declaration that the Notification issued by the High Court on 21.04.2008, making applicable the provisions of G.R. dated 01.11.2005 to the staff of the High Court and subordinate courts, would apply prospectively from 21.04.2008 and not to them. The facts reveal that on 20.06.2005, an advertisement was issued by the Registrar General of the High Court for filling up 48 posts of Clerks in the pay scale of 3050-4590, with the last date for submission of applications being 11.07.2005. The petitioners applied in response to this advertisement. The Government Resolution introducing the new pension scheme was dated 31.10.2005, and the High Court's notification adopting it was dated 21.04.2008. The court considered the issue of whether the petitioners, who applied before the cut-off date of 01.11.2005, should be covered by the old pension scheme. The court held that since the recruitment process had commenced prior to the cut-off date, the petitioners were entitled to the old pension scheme. The court directed that the High Court's notification of 21.04.2008 would apply prospectively and not to the petitioners. The petition was allowed, and the respondents were directed to extend the benefits of the old pension scheme to the petitioners.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Pension - Old Pension Scheme vs. New Pension Scheme - Applicability - The petitioners, who applied for Clerk posts pursuant to an advertisement issued on 20.06.2005, were held to be governed by the Old Pension Scheme in vogue prior to 01.11.2005, as the recruitment process had commenced before the cut-off date of 01.11.2005. The High Court's Notification dated 21.04.2008 making the Government Resolution of 31.10.2005 applicable to its staff was directed to apply prospectively from 21.04.2008 and not to the petitioners. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners, who applied for the post of Clerk in response to an advertisement issued on 20.06.2005, are governed by the Old Pension Scheme in vogue prior to 01.11.2005 or by the Defined Contributory Pension Scheme/National Pension Scheme introduced vide Government Resolution dated 31.10.2005.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to extend the benefits of the Old Pension Scheme to the petitioners. The High Court's Notification dated 21.04.2008 shall apply prospectively from 21.04.2008 and not to the petitioners.

Law Points

  • Pension Scheme
  • Old Pension Scheme
  • Defined Contributory Pension Scheme
  • National Pension Scheme
  • Government Resolution
  • Prospective Application
  • Recruitment Process
  • Cut-off Date
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (04) 86

WRIT PETITION NO. 2270 OF 2021

2023-04-28

S.V.GANGAPURWALA, ACTING CJ, SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

2023:BHC-OS:3857-DB

Mr. Vishal Kanade i/by Mr. Sagar A. Rane for the petitioners, Mr. Himanshu Takke, AGP for State-respondent no.1, Dr. Milind Sathe, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Rahul Nerlekar, Advocate for respondent no.2-BHC

Khilari Rajendra Eknath and Others

The State of Maharashtra and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking declaration regarding applicability of pension scheme

Remedy Sought

Declaration that petitioners are governed by Old Pension Scheme and that the High Court's notification of 21.04.2008 applies prospectively

Filing Reason

Petitioners applied for Clerk posts in response to advertisement dated 20.06.2005, but were sought to be covered by new pension scheme introduced vide G.R. dated 31.10.2005

Issues

Whether the petitioners, who applied for Clerk posts in response to advertisement dated 20.06.2005, are governed by the Old Pension Scheme or the new pension scheme introduced vide G.R. dated 31.10.2005

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they applied before the cut-off date of 01.11.2005 and thus should be covered by the old scheme Respondents likely argued that the new scheme applies to all employees appointed after 01.11.2005

Ratio Decidendi

Employees who applied for a post before the cut-off date for introduction of a new pension scheme are entitled to the old pension scheme, as the recruitment process had commenced prior to the cut-off date.

Judgment Excerpts

Petition is filed by 56 Clerks working on the establishment of the High Court of Bombay, Appellate Side seeking a declaration that they are governed by the provisions of the Old Pension Scheme in vogue prior to 01.11.2005 and the General Provident Fund Scheme. On 20.6.2005 an advertisement was issued by the Registrar General of the High Court for filling up 48 posts of Clerks on the establishment of the Bombay High Court, Appellate Side in the pay scale of 3050-4590.

Procedural History

The petition was filed in 2021, heard on 24th April 2023, and judgment pronounced on 28th April 2023.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Rejection of Plaints Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action and Barred by Limitation. Court holds that while considering an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, the court must ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case, Upholds Conviction Under Sections 324 and 323 IPC. Absence of Intention to Kill Found as Assault Was to Extract Money, Not Murder.