Search Results for "rectification order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "rectification order"

920 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 920 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved and Suit Barred by Limitation. Plaintiff failed to prove execution of agreement and suit was filed beyond three years from notice of refusal under Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Sandeep Kashinath Parab, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 15/06/1998 allegedly executed by the respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case — Interim Protection Extended Pending Regular Bail Application. Court holds that custodial interrogation is not required when the accused is willing to cooperate and the offence is bailable in nature under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

25 Nov 2025

The judgment pertains to two applications for anticipatory bail filed by Shyamsundar Radhyesham Agarwal and Balwant Kashinath Patil in connection with...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over 'MAUJ' vs 'MOJ' — No Deceptive Similarity Found. Phonetic and structural comparison of marks 'MAUJ' and 'MOJ' held not deceptively similar; plaintiff failed to establish prima facie case for interim relief.

5 Jun 2023

The plaintiff, Mauj Mobile Private Limited, filed a commercial IP suit alleging infringement of its registered trademark 'MAUJ' (registered in Classes...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Two Income Tax Appeals on Deduction Under Section 80-IA for Container Freight Stations. Substantial Questions of Law Include Whether CFS Qualifies as Inland Port and Scope of Assessment Under Section 153A.

21 Apr 2015

The appeals before the High Court of Bombay arose from orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowing deductions under Section 80-IA(4) of the I...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court upholds trial and first appellate court decrees regarding declaration of title and injunction, finding no substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC.

30 Jan 2014

The case is a Regular Second Appeal (RSA No.1858/2012) filed by the appellants (plaintiffs in the original suit) against the respondents (defendants) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Reference in Sales Tax Case, Holding Tribunal Must Adjudicate on Exim Scrips Levy Despite Ground Not Raised in Appeal Memo. Section 55 of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 Confers Wide Appellate Powers to Consider Any Necessary Ground.

16 Apr 2019

The case involves two Sales Tax References filed by M/s Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd. against the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra State. The ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds IPAB Order Expunging Trademark 'Creative' for Deceptive Similarity in Travel Services. Petitioner's mark 'Creative Tours & Travels' held deceptively similar to respondent's registered mark 'Creative Travel', causing confusion among consumers under Section 9(2)(a) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

4 May 2016

The petitioner, Creative Tours & Travels (India) Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Derivative Loss Set-off Case. Loss from derivatives trading on recognized stock exchange held not speculative under Section 43(5)(d) of Income Tax Act, 1961, and can be set off against other business income under Section 70.

6 May 2022

The appellant, Souvenir Developers (I) Pvt. Ltd., is a domestic company deriving income from toll collection business and also trading in shares and d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement Suit Over STIMULIV vs STIMULET. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Despite Differences in Pharmaceutical Formulation and Therapeutic Use.

1 Mar 2021

The dispute involves two pharmaceutical companies: Franco Indian Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff) and Corona Remedies Pvt Ltd (Defendant). The Plai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trademark Infringement Suit by Bristol Bakery Against Grupo Bimbo for 'Bimbo' Mark, Finding No Deceptive Similarity. The court held that the marks 'Bristol' and 'Bimbo' are not deceptively similar and that the defendant had prior rights, thereby refusing interim injunction and granting injunction in favor of the defendant.

6 Jul 2026

The judgment concerns two cross-suits between Bristol Bakery (plaintiff in one suit) and Grupo Bimbo S.A.B. DE C.V. and its affiliates (defendants in ...

28 29 30 31 32

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)